6 results (0.072 seconds)

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 61EXPL: 0

SubTypeValidator.java in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.9.2 mishandles default typing when ehcache is used (because of net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.DefaultTransactionManagerLookup), leading to remote code execution. El archivo SubTypeValidator.java en jackson-databind de FasterXML en versiones anteriores a la 2.9.9.2 maneja inapropiadamente la escritura predeterminada cuando se usa ehcache (debido a net.sf.ehcache.transaction.manager.DefaultTransactionManagerLookup), lo que conlleva a la ejecución de código remoto. A flaw was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind, where it would permit polymorphic deserialization of malicious objects using the ehcache and logback JNDI gadgets when used in conjunction with polymorphic type handling methods such as `enableDefaultTyping()` or when @JsonTypeInfo is using `Id.CLASS` or `Id.MINIMAL_CLASS` or in any other way which ObjectMapper.readValue might instantiate objects from unsafe sources. An attacker could use this flaw to execute arbitrary code. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/Mar/23 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:2824 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2743 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2858 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2935 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2936 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2937 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2938 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2998 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

It was found that the cookie used for CSRF prevention in Keycloak was not unique to each session. An attacker could use this flaw to gain access to an authenticated user session, leading to possible information disclosure or further attacks. Se ha descubierto que la cookie empleada para la prevención de CSRF en Keycloak no era única para cada sesión. Un atacante podría usar este fallo para obtener acceso a una sesión de un usuario autenticado, conduciendo a una posible divulgación de información o a más ataques. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101601 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2904 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2905 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2906 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484111 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12159 • CWE-613: Insufficient Session Expiration •

CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

It was found that Keycloak would accept a HOST header URL in the admin console and use it to determine web resource locations. An attacker could use this flaw against an authenticated user to attain reflected XSS via a malicious server. Se ha descubierto que Keycloak podría aceptar una URL de cabecera HOST en la consola de administración y emplearla para determinar localizaciones de recursos web. Un atacante podría usar este fallo contra un usuario autenticado para lograr un XSS reflejado mediante un servidor malicioso. It was found that keycloak would accept a HOST header URL in the admin console and use it to determine web resource locations. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101618 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2904 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2905 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2906 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489161 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12158 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.4.0 did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. An attacker with service account authentication could use this flaw to bypass normal permissions and delete users in a separate realm. Red Hat Keycloak, en versiones anteriores a la 2.4.0, no comprobaba correctamente los permisos al gestionar peticiones de eliminación de usuario de cuenta de servicio enviadas al servidor REST. Un atacante con autenticación de cuenta de servicio podría aprovechar este fallo para omitir permisos normales y eliminar usuarios en un realm separado. It was found that keycloak did not correctly check permissions when handling service account user deletion requests sent to the rest server. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97392 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388988 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8629 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

Red Hat Keycloak before version 2.5.1 has an implementation of HMAC verification for JWS tokens that uses a method that runs in non-constant time, potentially leaving the application vulnerable to timing attacks. Red Hat Keycloak, en versiones anteriores a la 2.5.1, tiene una implementación de la verificación HMAC para los tokens JWS que emplea un método que se ejecuta en tiempo no constante, lo que podría hacer que la aplicación sea vulnerable a ataques de sincronización. It was found that keycloak's implementation of HMAC verification for JWS tokens uses a method that runs in non-constant time, potentially leaving the application vulnerable to timing attacks. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0876.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97393 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038180 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0872 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0873 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412376 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2585 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •