Page 107 of 543 results (0.015 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0

Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox have unspecified vectors and impact, as claimed during ToorCon 2006. NOTE: the vendor and original researchers have released a follow-up comment disputing this issue, in which one researcher states that "I have no undisclosed Firefox vulnerabilities. The person who was speaking with me made this claim, and I honestly have no idea if he has them or not. ** IMPUGNADA ** Múltiples vulnerabilidades en Mozilla Firefox tienen vectores e impacto no especificados, como fue reclamado durante el ToorCon 2006. NOTA: el vendedor e investigadores originales han liberado un comentario de seguimiento impugnando este asunto, en el cual un investigador afirma que "No tengo vulnerabilidades de Firefox no reveladas. La persona que estuvo hablando conmigo hizo esta reclamación, y yo honestamente no tengo ni idea de si él las tiene o no". • http://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2006/10/02/update-possible-vulnerability-reported-at-toorcon http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/447493/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20294 http://www.securitypronews.com/insiderreports/insider/spn-49-20061003FirefoxVulnerabilityClaimWasAJoke.html •

CVSS: 6.4EPSS: 8%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0

Cross-domain vulnerability in Mozilla Firefox allows remote attackers to access restricted information from other domains via an object tag with a data parameter that references a link on the attacker's originating site that specifies a Location HTTP header that references the target site, which then makes that content available through the outerHTML attribute of the object. NOTE: this description was based on a report that has since been retracted by the original authors. The authors misinterpreted their test results. Other third parties also disputed the original report. Therefore, this is not a vulnerability. • http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1448 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438785/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438788/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438811/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438863/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/438864/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/439146/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18734 •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 25%CPEs: 24EXPL: 1

Double free vulnerability in the getRawDER function for nsIX509Cert in Firefox allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (hang) and possibly execute arbitrary code via certain Javascript code. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0609.html http://secunia.com/advisories/21269 http://secunia.com/advisories/21270 http://secunia.com/advisories/21336 http://secunia.com/advisories/21532 http://secunia.com/advisories/21631 http://secunia.com/advisories/22247 http://secunia.com/advisories/22299 http://secunia.com/advisories/22342 http://secunia.com/advisories/22849 http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1192 http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1210 http:&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 58%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

EvalInSandbox in Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird before 1.5.0.4 allows remote attackers to gain privileges via javascript that calls the valueOf method on objects that were created outside of the sandbox. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0609.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20376 http://secunia.com/advisories/20382 http://secunia.com/advisories/20561 http://secunia.com/advisories/20709 http://secunia.com/advisories/21134 http://secunia.com/advisories/21176 http://secunia.com/advisories/21178 http://secunia.com/advisories/21183 http://secunia.com/advisories/21188 http://secunia.com/advisories/21210 http://secunia.com/advisories/21269 http://secunia.com/advisories&#x •

CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0

Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird before 1.5.0.4 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via (1) nested <option> tags in a select tag, (2) a DOMNodeRemoved mutation event, (3) "Content-implemented tree views," (4) BoxObjects, (5) the XBL implementation, (6) an iframe that attempts to remove itself, which leads to memory corruption. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0609.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20376 http://secunia.com/advisories/20382 http://secunia.com/advisories/20561 http://secunia.com/advisories/20709 http://secunia.com/advisories/21134 http://secunia.com/advisories/21176 http://secunia.com/advisories/21178 http://secunia.com/advisories/21183 http://secunia.com/advisories/21188 http://secunia.com/advisories/21210 http://secunia.com/advisories/21269 http://secunia.com/advisories&#x • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •