CVSS: 6.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-7977 – ghostscript: .libfile does not honor -dSAFER
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-7977
Ghostscript before 9.21 might allow remote attackers to bypass the SAFER mode protection mechanism and consequently read arbitrary files via the use of the .libfile operator in a crafted postscript document. Ghostscript anterior a la versión 9.21 podría permitir que los atacantes remotos eludieran el mecanismo de protección del modo SAFER y, en consecuencia, leyeran archivos arbitrarios mediante el uso del operador .libfile en un documento Postscript manipulado. It was found that ghostscript function .libfile did not honor the -dSAFER option, usually used when processing untrusted documents, leading to information disclosure. A specially crafted postscript document could, in the context of the gs process, retrieve file content on the target machine. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=8abd22010eb4db0fb1b10e430d5f5d83e015ef70 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0013.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3691 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/09/29/28 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/05/15 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95334 https:/ • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 6%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-8602 – ghostscript: check for sufficient params in .sethalftone5
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-8602
The .sethalftone5 function in psi/zht2.c in Ghostscript before 9.21 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Postscript document that calls .sethalftone5 with an empty operand stack. La función .sethalftone5 en psi/zht2.c en Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a 9.21 permite a los atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída de la aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un documento Postscript que llama a .sethalftone5 con una pila de operandos vacía. It was found that ghostscript did not sufficiently check the validity of parameters given to the .sethalftone5 function. A specially crafted postscript document could cause a crash, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the gs process. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f5c7555c303 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0013.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0014.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3691 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/11/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/10/11/7 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95311 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697203 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi&# • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-704: Incorrect Type Conversion or Cast •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2009-0792 – argyllcms: Incomplete fix for CVE-2009-0583
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0792
Multiple integer overflows in icc.c in the International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (aka icclib), as used in Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier and Argyll Color Management System (CMS) 1.0.3 and earlier, allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by using a device file for a translation request that operates on a crafted image file and targets a certain "native color space," related to an ICC profile in a (1) PostScript or (2) PDF file with embedded images. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-0583. Múltiples desbordamientos de entero en icc.c en el International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (también conocido como icclib), como lo utilizado en Ghostscript v8.64 y versiones anteriores y Argyll Color Management System (CMS) v1.0.3 y versiones anteriores, permite a atacantes dependientes de contexto provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de búfer basado en montículo y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente ejecutar código de su elección utilizado un fichero de dispositivo para una petición de traducción que opera en un fichero de imagen manipulado y tiene como objetivo un determinado "espacio de color nativo," relacionado con un perfil ICC en un (1) PostScript o (2) fichero PDF file with embedded image con imágenes embebidas. NOTA: esta cuestión existe debido a una modificación inicial imcompleta de CVE-2009-0583. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00003.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34373 http://secunia.com/advisories/34667 http://secunia.com/advisories/34711 http://secunia.com/advisories/34726 http://secunia.com/advisories/34729 http://secunia.com/advisories/34732 http://secunia.com/advisories/35416 http://secunia.com/advisories/35559 http://secunia.com/advisories/35569 http://sec • CWE-189: Numeric Errors •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 13%CPEs: 14EXPL: 2CVE-2009-0196 – ghostscript: Missing boundary check in Ghostscript's jbig2dec library
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0196
Heap-based buffer overflow in the big2_decode_symbol_dict function (jbig2_symbol_dict.c) in the JBIG2 decoding library (jbig2dec) in Ghostscript 8.64, and probably earlier versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with a JBIG2 symbol dictionary segment with a large run length value. Desbordamiento de entero en la función big2_decode_symbol_dict (jbig2_symbol_dict.c) en la librería de decodificación JBIG2 (jbig2dec) en Ghostscript 8.64 y posiblemente versiones anteriores, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección mediante un fichero PDF que contenga un segmento de diccionario de símbolos JBIG2 con un valor grande de longitud de repetición(run length). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00010.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00003.html http://osvdb.org/53492 http://secunia.com/advisories/34292 http://secunia.com/advisories/34667 http://secunia.com/advisories/34729 http://secunia.com/advisories/34732 http://secunia.com/advisories/35416 http://secunia.com/advisories/35559 http://secunia.com/advisories/35569 http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2009-21 http://secur • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 23EXPL: 0CVE-2009-0583 – argyllcms: Multiple integer overflows in the International Color Consortium Format Library
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2009-0583
Multiple integer overflows in icc.c in the International Color Consortium (ICC) Format library (aka icclib), as used in Ghostscript 8.64 and earlier and Argyll Color Management System (CMS) 1.0.3 and earlier, allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer overflow and application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code by using a device file for a translation request that operates on a crafted image file and targets a certain "native color space," related to an ICC profile in a (1) PostScript or (2) PDF file with embedded images. Múltiples desbordamientos de enteros en icc.c en la libreria de formatos (alias icclib) del International Color Consortium (ICC), tal como se utiliza en Ghostscript 8.64 y anteriores y Argyll Color Management System (CMS) 1.0.3 y anteriores, permiten causar una denegación de servicio (con desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila y caída de la aplicación) a atacantes dependientes de contexto y posiblemente ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de un fichero de dispositivo para una solicitud de traducción que opera en un archivo de imagen creado y se dirige a un determinado "espacio de color nativo", en relación con un perfil ICC en un (1) PostScript o (2) archivo PDF con imágenes incrustadas. • http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=261087 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-03/msg00004.html http://secunia.com/advisories/34266 http://secunia.com/advisories/34373 http://secunia.com/advisories/34381 http://secunia.com/advisories/34393 http://secunia.com/advisories/34398 http://secunia.com/advisories/34418 http://secunia.com/advisories/34437 http://secunia.com/advisories/34443 http://secunia.com/advisories/34469 http://secunia.com/advisories/34729 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •