Page 14 of 556 results (0.021 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

Vulnerability in the Enterprise Manager for Fusion Middleware product of Oracle Enterprise Manager (component: FMW Control Plugin). The supported version that is affected are 11.1.1.9 and 12.2.1.3 Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Enterprise Manager for Fusion Middleware. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Enterprise Manager for Fusion Middleware accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Enterprise Manager for Fusion Middleware accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Enterprise Manager for Fusion Middleware. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). • https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2021.html •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 136EXPL: 1

In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value. En Apache Commons IO versiones anteriores a 2.7, Cuando se invoca el método FileNameUtils.normalize con una cadena de entrada inapropiada, como "//../foo" o "\\..\ foo", el resultado sería el mismo valor, por lo que posiblemente proporcionar acceso a archivos en el directorio principal, pero no más arriba (por lo tanto, salto de ruta "limited"), si el código de llamada usara el resultado para construir un valor de ruta • https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-556 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r01b4a1fcdf3311c936ce33d75a9398b6c255f00c1a2f312ac21effe1%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0bfa8f7921abdfae788b1f076a12f73a92c93cc0a6e1083bce0027c5%40%3Cnotifications.zookeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0d73e2071d1f1afe1a15da14c5b6feb2cf17e3871168d5a3c8451436%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1c2f4683c35696cf6f863e3c107e37ec41305b1930dd40c17260de71%40%3Ccommits.pulsar.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0

The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845 https://kc.mc • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 205EXPL: 0

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-772220.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fb9fa6b51defd48157eeb207f52181f735d96148 https://kb.pulse • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •

CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

A carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.22 and prior 2.0.x versions. Un archivo PDF cuidadosamente diseñado puede desencadenar una excepción OutOfMemory-Exception mientras se carga el archivo. Este problema afecta a Apache PDFBox versión 2.0.22 y versiones anteriores 2.0.x • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/19/10 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1218e60c32829f76943ecaca79237120c2ec1ab266459d711a578b50%40%3Cdev.pdfbox.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d268642f8b52456ee8f876b888b8ed7a9e9568c7770789f3ded7f9e%40%3Ccommits.ofbiz.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4cbc3f6981cd0a1a482531df9d44e4c42a7f63342a7ba78b7bff8a1b%40%3Cnotifications.james.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r54594251369e14c185da9662a5340a52afbbdf75d61c9c3a69c8f2e8%40%3Cdev.pdfbox.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value •