Page 14 of 162 results (0.012 seconds)

CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 46%CPEs: 34EXPL: 0

In Apache httpd before 2.2.34 and 2.4.x before 2.4.27, the value placeholder in [Proxy-]Authorization headers of type 'Digest' was not initialized or reset before or between successive key=value assignments by mod_auth_digest. Providing an initial key with no '=' assignment could reflect the stale value of uninitialized pool memory used by the prior request, leading to leakage of potentially confidential information, and a segfault in other cases resulting in denial of service. En Apache httpd, en versiones anteriores a la 2.2.34 y en versiones 2.4.x anteriores a la 2.4.27, el valor placeholder en cabeceras [Proxy-]Authorization del tipo 'Digest' no se inicializó o reinició antes de o entre las asignaciones sucesivas key=value por mod_auth_digest. Proporcionar una clave inicial sin asignación "=" podría reflejar el valor obsoleto de la memoria agrupada no inicializada utilizada por la petición anterior. Esto podría dar lugar al filtrado de información potencialmente confidencial y, en otros casos, a un fallo de segmentación que daría como resultado una denegación de servicio (DoS) It was discovered that the httpd's mod_auth_digest module did not properly initialize memory before using it when processing certain headers related to digest authentication. • http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3913 http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99569 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038906 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2478 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2479 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2708 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2709 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHS • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-456: Missing Initialization of a Variable •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

The PooledInvokerServlet in JBoss EAP 4.x and 5.x allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized payload. El PooledInvokerServlet de Jboss EAP en sus versiones 4.x y 5.x permite a un atacante remoto la ejecución de un código aleatorio mediante un payload de diseño serializado. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99079 https://access.redhat.com/solutions/178393 https://access.redhat.com/solutions/45530 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327037 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 7.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 0

It was found that the log file viewer in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application 6 and 7 allows arbitrary file read to authenticated user via path traversal. Se ha encontrado que el visor de archivos de log en Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application 6 y 7 permite que un archivo arbitrario sea leído por el usuario autenticado a través de un salto de directorio. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1409.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1551.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98967 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038757 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1410 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1411 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1412 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1548 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1549 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1550 h • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 9EXPL: 1

It was discovered in Undertow that the code that parsed the HTTP request line permitted invalid characters. This could be exploited, in conjunction with a proxy that also permitted the invalid characters but with a different interpretation, to inject data into the HTTP response. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack, or obtain sensitive information from requests other than their own. Se ha descubierto en Undertow que el código que analizaba la línea de petición HTTP permitía caracteres no válidos. Esto podría ser explotado, en conjunto con un proxy que también permita caracteres inválidos pero con una interpretación diferente, para inyectar datos en la respuesta HTTP. • https://github.com/tafamace/CVE-2017-2666 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1409.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98966 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1410 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1411 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1412 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3458 ht • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 7EXPL: 0

It was found in Undertow before 1.3.28 that with non-clean TCP close, the Websocket server gets into infinite loop on every IO thread, effectively causing DoS. Se ha encontrado en Undertow en versiones anteriores a la 1.3.28 que con el cierre no seguro de TCP, el servidor Websocket entra en bucle infinito en cada hilo IO, provocando efectivamente una denegación de servicio (DoS). It was found that with non-clean TCP close, Websocket server gets into infinite loop on every IO thread, effectively causing DoS. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1409.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98965 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1410 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1411 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1412 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3458 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id&# • CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') •