CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 1CVE-2018-12383 – Mozilla: Setting a master password post-Firefox 58 does not delete unencrypted previously stored passwords
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12383
If a user saved passwords before Firefox 58 and then later set a master password, an unencrypted copy of these passwords is still accessible. This is because the older stored password file was not deleted when the data was copied to a new format starting in Firefox 58. The new master password is added only on the new file. This could allow the exposure of stored password data outside of user expectations. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 62, Firefox ESR < 60.2.1, and Thunderbird < 60.2.1. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105276 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041610 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041701 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2834 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2835 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3403 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3458 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1475775 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00011.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201810- • CWE-212: Improper Removal of Sensitive Information Before Storage or Transfer CWE-522: Insufficiently Protected Credentials •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 11EXPL: 2CVE-2018-14624 – 389-ds-base: Server crash through modify command with large DN
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-14624
A vulnerability was discovered in 389-ds-base through versions 1.3.7.10, 1.3.8.8 and 1.4.0.16. The lock controlling the error log was not correctly used when re-opening the log file in log__error_emergency(). An attacker could send a flood of modifications to a very large DN, which would cause slapd to crash. Se ha descubierto una vulnerabilidad en 389-ds-base hasta las versiones 1.3.7.10, 1.3.8.8 y 1.4.0.16. El bloqueo que controla el registro de errores no se empleaba correctamente al reabrir el archivo de registro en log__error_emergency(). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00033.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2757 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14624 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00037.html https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49937 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-14624 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1619450 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-14618 – curl: NTLM password overflow via integer overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-14618
curl before version 7.61.1 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the NTLM authentication code. The internal function Curl_ntlm_core_mk_nt_hash multiplies the length of the password by two (SUM) to figure out how large temporary storage area to allocate from the heap. The length value is then subsequently used to iterate over the password and generate output into the allocated storage buffer. On systems with a 32 bit size_t, the math to calculate SUM triggers an integer overflow when the password length exceeds 2GB (2^31 bytes). This integer overflow usually causes a very small buffer to actually get allocated instead of the intended very huge one, making the use of that buffer end up in a heap buffer overflow. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041605 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1880 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2018-14618 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-436177.pdf https://curl.haxx.se/docs/CVE-2018-14618.html https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2018-0014 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201903-03 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3765-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/ • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-131: Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16542 – ghostscript: .definemodifiedfont memory corruption if /typecheck is handled (699668)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16542
In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use insufficient interpreter stack-size checking during error handling to crash the interpreter. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, los atacantes que puedan proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados podrían emplear una comprobación insuficiente del tamaño de la pila del intérprete durante el manejo de errores para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete. It was discovered that ghostscript did not properly handle certain stack overflow error conditions. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=b575e1ec42cc86f6a58c603f2a88fcc2af699cc8 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q3/182 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105337 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2918 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699668 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 https://acc • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2018-16541 – ghostscript: Incorrect free logic in pagedevice replacement (699664)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-16541
In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use incorrect free logic in pagedevice replacement to crash the interpreter. En Artifex Ghostscript en versiones anteriores a la 9.24, los atacantes que puedan proporcionar archivos PostScript manipulados podrían emplear una lógica libre incorrecta en el reemplazo pagedevice para provocar el cierre inesperado del intérprete. It was discovered that the ghostscript device cleanup did not properly handle devices replaced with a null device. An attacker could possibly exploit this to bypass the -dSAFER protection and crash ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the ghostscript context via a specially crafted PostScript document. • http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=ghostpdl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=241d91112771a6104de10b3948c3f350d6690c1d https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3834 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699664 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/09/msg00015.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3768-1 https://www.artifex.com/news/ghostscript-security-resolved https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4288 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE- • CWE-416: Use After Free •