Page 15 of 99 results (0.008 seconds)

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0

The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Infoblox DNS One, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDPYJ http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 1%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0

BIND 4 and BIND 8, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2002/Nov/msg00000.html http://secunia.com/advisories/20217 http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDPYP http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDT4U http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FZSLQ http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/434523/100/0/threaded •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 32EXPL: 0

The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Fujitsu UXP/V, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. • http://www.imconf.net/imw-2002/imw2002-papers/198.pdf http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/457875 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/IAFY-5FDT5K http://www.rnp.br/cais/alertas/2002/cais-ALR-19112002a.html •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 12%CPEs: 11EXPL: 1

BIND 8.3.x through 8.3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (termination due to assertion failure) via a request for a subdomain that does not exist, with an OPT resource record with a large UDP payload size. BIND 8.3.x a 8.3.3 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (terminación debido a fallo en aseveración) mediante una petición para un subdominio que no existe, con un registro de recurso OPT con una carga UDP grande. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/22011 http://bvlive01.iss.net/issEn/delivery/xforce/alertdetail.jsp?oid=21469 http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2002/Nov/msg00000.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=103713117612842&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=103763574715133&w=2 http://online.securityfocus.com/advisories/4999 http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/300019 http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-31.html http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/n-013. •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 15%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

Buffer overflow in named in BIND 4 versions 4.9.10 and earlier, and 8 versions 8.3.3 and earlier, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a certain DNS server response containing SIG resource records (RR). Desbordamiento de búfer en BIND versiones 4 anteriores a 4.9.10, y versiones 8 anteriores a 8.3.3, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario mediante una cierta respuesta de servidor DNS conteniendo registros de recursos (RR) SIG. • ftp://patches.sgi.com/support/free/security/advisories/20021201-01-P http://bvlive01.iss.net/issEn/delivery/xforce/alertdetail.jsp?oid=21469 http://distro.conectiva.com.br/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000546 http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2002/Nov/msg00000.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=103713117612842&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=103763574715133&w=2 http://online.securityfocus.com/advisories/4999 http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/300019 http: •