CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2019-2765
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-2765
Vulnerability in the Oracle Solaris product of Oracle Systems (component: Filesystem). Supported versions that are affected are 10 and 11. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Solaris executes to compromise Oracle Solaris. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Solaris, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Solaris accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Solaris accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Solaris. • http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16168 – sqlite: Division by zero in whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16168
In SQLite through 3.29.0, whereLoopAddBtreeIndex in sqlite3.c can crash a browser or other application because of missing validation of a sqlite_stat1 sz field, aka a "severe division by zero in the query planner." En SQLite versiones hasta 3.29.0, la función whereLoopAddBtreeIndex en el archivo sqlite3.c puede bloquear un navegador u otra aplicación debido a la falta de comprobación de un campo sqlite_stat1 sz, también se conoce como "severe division by zero in the query planner.". • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00033.html https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00037.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XZARJHJJDBHI7CE5PZEBXS5HKK6HXKW2 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-16 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190926-0003 https:/& • CWE-369: Divide By Zero •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 28EXPL: 0CVE-2019-16056 – python: email.utils.parseaddr wrongly parses email addresses
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-16056
An issue was discovered in Python through 2.7.16, 3.x through 3.5.7, 3.6.x through 3.6.9, and 3.7.x through 3.7.4. The email module wrongly parses email addresses that contain multiple @ characters. An application that uses the email module and implements some kind of checks on the From/To headers of a message could be tricked into accepting an email address that should be denied. An attack may be the same as in CVE-2019-11340; however, this CVE applies to Python more generally. Se descubrió un problema en Python versiones hasta 2.7.16, versiones 3.x hasta 3.5.7, versiones 3.6.x hasta 3.6.9 y versiones 3.7.x hasta 3.7.4. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00062.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00063.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-11/msg00021.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3725 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3948 https://bugs.python.org/issue • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13565
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13565
An issue was discovered in OpenLDAP 2.x before 2.4.48. When using SASL authentication and session encryption, and relying on the SASL security layers in slapd access controls, it is possible to obtain access that would otherwise be denied via a simple bind for any identity covered in those ACLs. After the first SASL bind is completed, the sasl_ssf value is retained for all new non-SASL connections. Depending on the ACL configuration, this can affect different types of operations (searches, modifications, etc.). In other words, a successful authorization step completed by one user affects the authorization requirement for a different user. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues. •
CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2019-13057
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-13057
An issue was discovered in the server in OpenLDAP before 2.4.48. When the server administrator delegates rootDN (database admin) privileges for certain databases but wants to maintain isolation (e.g., for multi-tenant deployments), slapd does not properly stop a rootDN from requesting authorization as an identity from another database during a SASL bind or with a proxyAuthz (RFC 4370) control. (It is not a common configuration to deploy a system where the server administrator and a DB administrator enjoy different levels of trust.) Se detectó un problema en el servidor en OpenLDAP anterior a versión 2.4.48. Cuando el administrador del servidor delega los privilegios de tipo rootDN (administrador de base de datos) para ciertas bases de datos, pero quiere mantener el aislamiento (por ejemplo, para implementaciones de múltiples inquilinos), slapd no detiene apropiadamente un rootDN de solicitar una autorización como una identidad de otra base de datos durante un enlace SASL o con un control proxyAuthz (RFC 4370). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00053.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00058.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Dec/26 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10365 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/08/msg00024.html https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Dec/23 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190822-0004 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT210788 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4 •