CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 2CVE-2013-7338
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-7338
Python before 3.3.4 RC1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a file size value larger than the size of the zip file to the (1) ZipExtFile.read, (2) ZipExtFile.read(n), (3) ZipExtFile.readlines, (4) ZipFile.extract, or (5) ZipFile.extractall function. Python anterior a 3.3.4 RC1 permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (bucle infinito y consumo de CPU) a través de un valor de tamaño de archivo más grande que el tamaño del archivo zip hacia la función (1) ZipExtFile.read, (2) ZipExtFile.read(n), (3) ZipExtFile.readlines, (4) ZipFile.extract o (5) ZipFile.extractall. • http://bugs.python.org/issue20078 http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/79ea4ce431b1 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-05/msg00008.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q1/592 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q1/595 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65179 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1029973 https://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/changelog.html https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201503& • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 60%CPEs: 52EXPL: 4CVE-2014-1912 – Python - 'socket.recvfrom_into()' Remote Buffer Overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-1912
Buffer overflow in the socket.recvfrom_into function in Modules/socketmodule.c in Python 2.5 before 2.7.7, 3.x before 3.3.4, and 3.4.x before 3.4rc1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted string. Desbordamiento de buffer en la función socket.recvfrom_into en Modules/socketmodule.c en Python 2.5 anterior a 2.7.7, 3.x anterior a 3.3.4 y 3.4.x anterior a 3.4rc1 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de una cadena manipulada. It was discovered that the socket.recvfrom_into() function failed to check the size of the supplied buffer. This could lead to a buffer overflow when the function was called with an insufficiently sized buffer. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/31875 http://bugs.python.org/issue20246 http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/87673659d8f7 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2015/Aug/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-04/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-05/msg00008.html http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=GHXSmNEg http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1064.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1330.html http://www&# • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 1CVE-2013-0340
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-0340
expat 2.1.0 and earlier does not properly handle entities expansion unless an application developer uses the XML_SetEntityDeclHandler function, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption), send HTTP requests to intranet servers, or read arbitrary files via a crafted XML document, aka an XML External Entity (XXE) issue. NOTE: it could be argued that because expat already provides the ability to disable external entity expansion, the responsibility for resolving this issue lies with application developers; according to this argument, this entry should be REJECTed, and each affected application would need its own CVE. expat 2.1.0 y anteriores no maneja adecuadamente entidades de expansión a menos que un desarrollador de aplicaciones use la función XML_SetEntityDeclHandler, esto permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos), enviar peticiones HTTP a los servidores de la intranet, o leer archivos arbitrarios a través de un documento XML manipulado, también conocido como problema XML External Entity (XXE) NOTA: se podría argumentar que debido a que expat ya ofrece la posibilidad de desactivar la expansión entidad externa, la responsabilidad de la solución de este problema se encuentra con los desarrolladores de aplicaciones, de acuerdo con este argumento, esta entrada debe ser rechazada, y cada aplicación afectada tendría su propio CVE . • http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/22/3 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Oct/61 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Oct/62 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Oct/63 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/34 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/38 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep/39 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Sep • CWE-611: Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 5%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2013-2099 – python: ssl.match_hostname() DoS via certificates with specially crafted hostname wildcard patterns
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-2099
Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the ssl.match_hostname function in Python 3.2.x, 3.3.x, and earlier, and unspecified versions of python-backports-ssl_match_hostname as used for older Python versions, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via multiple wildcard characters in the common name in a certificate. Vulnerabilidad de la complejidad algorítmica en la función ssl.match_hostname en Python 3.2.x, 3.3.x, y anteriores, y las versiones no especificadas de python-backports-ssl_match_hostname como las usadas por versiones anteriores de Python, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (consumo de CPU ) a través de múltiples caracteres comodín en el nombre común en el certificado. A denial of service flaw was found in the way Python's SSL module implementation performed matching of certain certificate names. A remote attacker able to obtain a valid certificate that contained multiple wildcard characters could use this flaw to issue a request to validate such a certificate, resulting in excessive consumption of CPU. • http://bugs.python.org/issue17980 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1690.html http://secunia.com/advisories/55107 http://secunia.com/advisories/55116 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/16/6 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1983-1 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1984-1 http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1985-1 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:1166 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963260 https://access.redhat.com/ • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0CVE-2013-4238 – python: hostname check bypassing vulnerability in SSL module
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-4238
The ssl.match_hostname function in the SSL module in Python 2.6 through 3.4 does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. La función ssl.match_hostname en el módulo SSL en Python v2.6 hasta v3.4 no manejar adecuadamente un carácter “\0” en un nombre de dominio en el campo Subject Alternative Name de un certificado X.509, lo que permite a atacantes "man-in-the-middle" suplantar servidores SSL de su elección mediante un certificado manipulado expedido por una Autoridad Certificadora legítima, un problema relacionado con CVE-2009-2408 • http://bugs.python.org/issue18709 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-01/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00026.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00027.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00028.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00042.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-09/msg00043.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •