Page 16 of 880 results (0.014 seconds)

CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 23EXPL: 1

SDL (Simple DirectMedia Layer) through 1.2.15 and 2.x through 2.0.9 has a heap-based buffer over-read in BlitNtoN in video/SDL_blit_N.c when called from SDL_SoftBlit in video/SDL_blit.c. hasta 2.0.9, presenta una lectura excesiva del búfer en la región heap de la memoria en BlitNtoN en el archivo video/SDL_blit_N.c cuando es llamado desde SDL_SoftBlit en el archivo video/SDL_blit.c. A heap-based buffer overflow was discovered in SDL in the SDL_BlitCopy() function, that was called while copying an existing surface into a new optimized one, due to lack of validation while loading a BMP image in the SDL_LoadBMP_RW() function. An application that uses SDL to parse untrusted input files may be vulnerable to this flaw, which could allow an attacker to make the application crash or possibly execute code. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00012.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00030.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00093.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00094.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3950 https:/ • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

The virConnectBaselineHypervisorCPU() and virConnectCompareHypervisorCPU() libvirt APIs, 4.x.x before 4.10.1 and 5.x.x before 5.4.1, accept an "emulator" argument to specify the program providing emulation for a domain. Since v1.2.19, libvirt will execute that program to probe the domain's capabilities. Read-only clients could specify an arbitrary path for this argument, causing libvirtd to execute a crafted executable with its own privileges. Las APIs libvirt de las funciones virConnectBaselineHypervisorCPU() y virConnectCompareHypervisorCPU(), versiones 4.x.x anteriores a 4.10.1 y versiones 5.x.x anteriores a 5.4.1, aceptan un argumento "emulator" para especificar el programa que proporciona emulación para un dominio. Desde versión v1.2.19, libvirt ejecutará ese programa para examinar las capacidades del dominio. • https://access.redhat.com/libvirt-privesc-vulnerabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10168 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-18 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10168 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720118 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

It was discovered that libvirtd, versions 4.x.x before 4.10.1 and 5.x.x before 5.4.1, would permit readonly clients to use the virDomainManagedSaveDefineXML() API, which would permit them to modify managed save state files. If a managed save had already been created by a privileged user, a local attacker could modify this file such that libvirtd would execute an arbitrary program when the domain was resumed. Se detectó que libvirtd, versiones 4.x.x anteriores a 4.10.1 y versiones 5.x.x anteriores a 5.4.1, permitiría a los clientes de solo lectura utilizar la API de la función virDomainManagedSaveDefineXML(), lo que les permitiría modificar archivos de estado managed save. Si un managed save ya ha sido creado por un usuario privilegiado, un atacante local podría modificar este archivo de manera que libvirtd ejecutaría un programa arbitrario cuando el dominio esté reanudado. It was discovered that libvirtd would permit readonly clients to use the virDomainManagedSaveDefineXML() API, which would permit them to modify managed save state files. • https://access.redhat.com/libvirt-privesc-vulnerabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10166 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-18 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10166 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720114 • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 14EXPL: 0

The virConnectGetDomainCapabilities() libvirt API, versions 4.x.x before 4.10.1 and 5.x.x before 5.4.1, accepts an "emulatorbin" argument to specify the program providing emulation for a domain. Since v1.2.19, libvirt will execute that program to probe the domain's capabilities. Read-only clients could specify an arbitrary path for this argument, causing libvirtd to execute a crafted executable with its own privileges. La API libvirt de la función virConnectGetDomainCapabilities(), versiones 4.x.x anteriores a 4.10.1 y versiones 5.x.x anteriores a 5.4.1, acepta un argumento "emulatorbin" para especificar el programa que proporciona emulación para un dominio. Desde versión v1.2.19, libvirt ejecutará ese programa para examinar las capacidades del dominio. • https://access.redhat.com/libvirt-privesc-vulnerabilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10167 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202003-18 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-10167 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720117 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges CWE-284: Improper Access Control CWE-862: Missing Authorization •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 5

When using the gdImageCreateFromXbm() function in the GD Graphics Library (aka LibGD) 2.2.5, as used in the PHP GD extension in PHP versions 7.1.x below 7.1.30, 7.2.x below 7.2.19 and 7.3.x below 7.3.6, it is possible to supply data that will cause the function to use the value of uninitialized variable. This may lead to disclosing contents of the stack that has been left there by previous code. Cuando se usa la función gdImageCreateFromXbm () en la Biblioteca de gráficos GD (también conocida como LibGD) 2.2.5, como se usa en la extensión PHP GD en las versiones de PHP 7.1.x debajo de 7.1.30, 7.2.x debajo de 7.2.19 y 7.3.x debajo 7.3.6, es posible suministrar datos que harán que la función use el valor de la variable no inicializada. Esto puede llevar a revelar el contenido de la pila que ha quedado allí por código anterior. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00020.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2519 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3299 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=929821 https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=77973 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1724149 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1724432 https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi? • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-457: Use of Uninitialized Variable CWE-908: Use of Uninitialized Resource •