CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 96%CPEs: 8EXPL: 1CVE-2014-0195 – OpenSSL DTLS Fragment Out-Of-Bounds Write Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0195
The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment. La función dtls1_reassemble_fragment en d1_both.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0m y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1h no valida debidamente longitudes de fragmentos en mensajes DTLS ClientHello, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario o causar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de buffer y caída de aplicación) a través de un fragmento no inicial largo. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of OpenSSL. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of DTLS packets. The issue lies in the assumption that all fragments specify the same message size. • https://github.com/ricedu/CVE-2014-0195 http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.asc http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/Once-Bled-Twice-Shy-OpenSSL-CVE-2014-0195/ba-p/6501048 http://h30499.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Security-Research-Blog/ZDI-14-173-CVE-2014-0195-OpenSSL-DTLS-Fragment-Out-of-Bounds/ba-p/6501002 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 4%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0198 – openssl: SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS NULL pointer dereference in do_ssl3_write()
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0198
The do_ssl3_write function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL 1.x through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, does not properly manage a buffer pointer during certain recursive calls, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via vectors that trigger an alert condition. La función do_ssl3_write en s3_pkt.c en OpenSSL 1.x hasta 1.0.1g, cuando SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS está habilitado, no maneja debidamente un puntero de buffer durante ciertas llamadas recursivas, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (referencia a puntero nulo y caída de aplicación) a través de vectores que provocan una condición de alerta. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0204.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB29195 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00016.html http://lists.opens • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 2%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2010-5298 – openssl: freelist misuse causing a possible use-after-free
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2010-5298
Race condition in the ssl3_read_bytes function in s3_pkt.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.1g, when SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS is enabled, allows remote attackers to inject data across sessions or cause a denial of service (use-after-free and parsing error) via an SSL connection in a multithreaded environment. Condición de carrera en la función ssl3_read_bytes en s3_pkt.c en OpenSSL hasta 1.0.1g, cuando SSL_MODE_RELEASE_BUFFERS está habilitado, permite a atacantes remotos inyectar datos a través de sesiones o causar una denegación de servicio (error de uso después de liberación y análisis sintáctico) a través de una conexión SSL en un entorno con múltiples hilos. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0187.html http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/patches/5.5/common/004_openssl.patch.sig http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB29195 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00016.html http:/& • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 54EXPL: 16CVE-2014-0160 – OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0160
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Las implementaciones de (1) TLS y (2) DTLS en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1g no manejan adecuadamente paquetes Heartbeat Extension, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible desde la memoria de proceso a través de paquetes manipulados que desencadenan una sobrelectura del buffer, según lo demostrado mediante la lectura de claves privadas, relacionado con d1_both.c y t1_lib.c, también conocido como bug Heartbleed. An information disclosure flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS and DTLS Heartbeat Extension packets. A malicious TLS or DTLS client or server could send a specially crafted TLS or DTLS Heartbeat packet to disclose a limited portion of memory per request from a connected client or server. Note that the disclosed portions of memory could potentially include sensitive information such as private keys. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32764 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32998 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32745 https://github.com/0x90/CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/jdauphant/patch-openssl-CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/caiqiqi/OpenSSL-HeartBleed-CVE-2014-0160-PoC https://github.com/obayesshelton/CVE-2014-0160-Scanner https://github.com/MrE-Fog/CVE-2014-0160-Chrome-Plugin https://github.com/Xyl2k/CVE-2014&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data •
CVSS: 1.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 96EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0076
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0076
The Montgomery ladder implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.0l does not ensure that certain swap operations have a constant-time behavior, which makes it easier for local users to obtain ECDSA nonces via a FLUSH+RELOAD cache side-channel attack. La implementación de la escala Montgomery en OpenSSL hasta la versión 1.0.0l no asegura que ciertas operaciones de intercambio tengan un comportamiento constante en el tiempo, lo que facilita a usuarios locales obtener nonces ECDSA a través de un ataque de caché de canal lateral FLUSH+RELOAD. • http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0165.html http://eprint.iacr.org/2014/140 http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=2198be3483259de374f91e57d247d0fc667aef29 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-04/msg00007.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140266410314613&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140317760000786&w=2 http&# • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •