CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 22EXPL: 0CVE-2017-1000410 – kernel: Stack information leak in the EFS element
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-1000410
The Linux kernel version 3.3-rc1 and later is affected by a vulnerability lies in the processing of incoming L2CAP commands - ConfigRequest, and ConfigResponse messages. This info leak is a result of uninitialized stack variables that may be returned to an attacker in their uninitialized state. By manipulating the code flows that precede the handling of these configuration messages, an attacker can also gain some control over which data will be held in the uninitialized stack variables. This can allow him to bypass KASLR, and stack canaries protection - as both pointers and stack canaries may be leaked in this manner. Combining this vulnerability (for example) with the previously disclosed RCE vulnerability in L2CAP configuration parsing (CVE-2017-1000251) may allow an attacker to exploit the RCE against kernels which were built with the above mitigations. • http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q4/357 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102101 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0654 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0676 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1062 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1130 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1170 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1319 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes+in+StruxureWare+Data+Center+Expert+v7.6 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7536 – hibernate-validator: Privilege escalation when running under the security manager
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7536
In Hibernate Validator 5.2.x before 5.2.5 final, 5.3.x, and 5.4.x, it was found that when the security manager's reflective permissions, which allows it to access the private members of the class, are granted to Hibernate Validator, a potential privilege escalation can occur. By allowing the calling code to access those private members without the permission an attacker may be able to validate an invalid instance and access the private member value via ConstraintViolation#getInvalidValue(). En Hibernate Validator 5.2.x anteriores a 5.2.5 final, 5.3.x y 5.4.x, se ha detectado que cuando los permisos reflectivos del gestor de seguridad, el cual accede a los miembros privados de la clase, se conceden a Hibernate Validator, podría ocurrir un escalado de privilegios. Permitiendo que el código de llamada acceda a esos miembros privados sin ningún permiso, el atacante podría validar una instancia no válida y acceder al valor del miembro privado mediante ConstraintViolation#getInvalidValue(). It was found that when the security manager's reflective permissions, which allows it to access the private members of the class, are granted to Hibernate Validator, a potential privilege escalation can occur. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/101048 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039744 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2808 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2809 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2810 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2811 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3141 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3454 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:3456 https: • CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') CWE-592: DEPRECATED: Authentication Bypass Issues •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 49%CPEs: 52EXPL: 1CVE-2017-7525 – jackson-databind: Deserialization vulnerability via readValue method of ObjectMapper
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7525
A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind, versions before 2.6.7.1, 2.7.9.1 and 2.8.9, which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. Se ha descubierto un error de deserialización en jackson-databind, en versiones anteriores a la 2.6.7.1, 2.7.9.1 y a la 2.8.9, que podría permitir que un usuario no autenticado ejecute código enviando las entradas maliciosamente manipuladas al método readValue de ObjectMapper. A deserialization flaw was discovered in the jackson-databind which could allow an unauthenticated user to perform code execution by sending the maliciously crafted input to the readValue method of the ObjectMapper. • https://github.com/Ingenuity-Fainting-Goats/CVE-2017-7525-Jackson-Deserialization-Lab http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2018-3678067.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2018-4258247.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2018-4428296.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/99623 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039744 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1039947 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040360 https://access.redhat.com/errat • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-184: Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 20EXPL: 0CVE-2018-6485 – glibc: Integer overflow in posix_memalign in memalign functions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-6485
An integer overflow in the implementation of the posix_memalign in memalign functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.26 and earlier could cause these functions to return a pointer to a heap area that is too small, potentially leading to heap corruption. Un desbordamiento de enteros en la implementación de posix_memalign en las funciones memalign en GNU C Library (también conocido como glibc o libc6) en versiones 2.26 y anteriores podría provocar que estas funciones devuelvan un puntero a un área de la memoria dinámica (heap) demasiado pequeña, pudiendo corromper el heap. • http://bugs.debian.org/878159 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102912 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0327 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3092 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22343 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4218-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/4416-1 https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2019-5072813.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-6485 https:/ • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 4CVE-2018-1000001 – glibc - 'realpath()' Privilege Escalation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1000001
In glibc 2.26 and earlier there is confusion in the usage of getcwd() by realpath() which can be used to write before the destination buffer leading to a buffer underflow and potential code execution. En glibc 2.26 y anteriores existe una confusión en el uso de getcwd() por realpath(), que puede emplearse para escribir antes del búfer de destino. Esto conduce a un subdesbordamiento de búfer y a una potencial ejecución de código. glibc suffers from a getcwd() local privilege escalation vulnerability. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44889 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43775 https://github.com/0x00-0x00/CVE-2018-1000001 https://github.com/usernameid0/tools-for-CVE-2018-1000001 http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2018/q1/38 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102525 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040162 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0805 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190404-0003 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3534-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •