CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 45EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2178 – openssl: Non-constant time codepath followed for certain operations in DSA implementation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2178
The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations, which makes it easier for local users to discover a DSA private key via a timing side-channel attack. La función dsa_sign_setup en crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c en OpenSSL hasta la versión 1.0.2h no asegura correctamente la utilización de operaciones de tiempo constante, lo que facilita a usuarios locales descubrir una clave privada DSA a través de un ataque de sincronización de canal lateral. It was discovered that OpenSSL did not always use constant time operations when computing Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) signatures. A local attacker could possibly use this flaw to obtain a private DSA key belonging to another user or service running on the same system. • http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/594.pdf http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org& • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 15%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2177 – openssl: Possible integer overflow vulnerabilities in codebase
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2177
OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c. OpenSSL hasta la versión 1.0.2h no utiliza correctamente la aritmética de puntero para comprobaciones de límites de buffer de memoria dinámica, lo que podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de entero y caída de aplicación) o posiblemente tener otro impacto no especificado aprovechando un comportamiento malloc no esperado, relacionado con s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, y t1_lib.c. Multiple integer overflow flaws were found in the way OpenSSL performed pointer arithmetic. A remote attacker could possibly use these flaws to cause a TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL to crash. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.h • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2000-1254
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2000-1254
crypto/rsa/rsa_gen.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.6 mishandles C bitwise-shift operations that exceed the size of an expression, which makes it easier for remote attackers to defeat cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging improper RSA key generation on 64-bit HP-UX platforms. crypto/rsa/rsa_gen.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 0.9.6 maneja incorrectamente operaciones de desplazamiento a nivel de bit en C que exceden el tamaño de una expresión, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos vencer mecanismos de protección criptográfica aprovechando la generación incorrecta de claves RSA sobre plataformas HP-UX de 64-bit. • http://marc.info/?l=openssl-users&m=95961024500509 http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21995039 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/04/17 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/90109 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1035750 https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=db82b8f9bd432a59aea8e1014694e15fc457c2bb • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 8%CPEs: 61EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2105 – openssl: EVP_EncodeUpdate overflow
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2105
Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data. Desbordamiento de entero en la función EVP_EncodeUpdate en crypto/evp/encode.c en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1t y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2h permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (corrupción de memoria dinámica) a través de una gran cantidad de datos binarios. An integer overflow flaw, leading to a buffer overflow, was found in the way the EVP_EncodeUpdate() function of OpenSSL parsed very large amounts of input data. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash an application using OpenSSL or, possibly, execute arbitrary code with the permissions of the user running that application. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183457.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183607.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184605.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/ • CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 90%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2108 – openssl: Memory corruption in the ASN.1 encoder
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2108
The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer underflow and memory corruption) via an ANY field in crafted serialized data, aka the "negative zero" issue. La implementación ASN.1 en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1o y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2c permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario o provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento inferior de buffer y corrupción de memoria) a través de un campo ANY en datos serializados manipulados, también conocido como el problema "cero negativo". A flaw was found in the way OpenSSL encoded certain ASN.1 data structures. An attacker could use this flaw to create a specially crafted certificate which, when verified or re-encoded by OpenSSL, could cause it to crash, or execute arbitrary code using the permissions of the user running an application compiled against the OpenSSL library. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Jul/msg00000.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183457.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/183607.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-May/184605.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/msg00001.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-05/ • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •