CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 218EXPL: 4CVE-2019-11358 – jquery: Prototype pollution in object's prototype leading to denial of service, remote code execution, or property injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11358
jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. jQuery, en versiones anteriores a 3.4.0, como es usado en Drupal, Backdrop CMS, y otros productos, maneja mal jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) debido a la contaminación de Object.prototype. Si un objeto fuente no sanitizado contenía una propiedad enumerable __proto__, podría extender el Object.prototype nativo. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in jquery. Untrusted JSON passed to the `extend` function could lead to modifying objects up the prototype chain, including the global Object. • https://github.com/isacaya/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2019-11358 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00025.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152787/dotCMS-5.1.1-Vulnerable-Dependencies.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153237/RetireJS-CORS-Issue-Script-Execution.html http://packetstormsecurity.c • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 29EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7658 – jetty: Incorrect header handling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7658
In Eclipse Jetty Server, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all non HTTP/1.x configurations), and 9.4.x (all HTTP/1.x configurations), when presented with two content-lengths headers, Jetty ignored the second. When presented with a content-length and a chunked encoding header, the content-length was ignored (as per RFC 2616). If an intermediary decided on the shorter length, but still passed on the longer body, then body content could be interpreted by Jetty as a pipelined request. If the intermediary was imposing authorization, the fake pipelined request would bypass that authorization. En Eclipse Jetty Server, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones que no sean HTTP/1.x) y versiones 9.4.x (todas las configuraciones HTTP/1.x), cuando se presentan con dos cabeceras content-lengths, Jetty ignora la segunda. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106566 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535669 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread& • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7657 – jetty: HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7657
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), los fragmentos transfer-encoding se gestionan de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0910 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535668 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2018-12538
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12538
In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore. En Eclipse Jetty, desde la versión 9.4.0 hasta la 9.4.8, al emplear el FileSessionDataStore opcional provisto por Jetty para el almacenamiento persistente de detalles HttpSession, es posible que un usuario malicioso acceda/secuestre otras HttpSessions e incluso elimine HttpSessions sin coincidencias presentes en el almacenamiento FileSystem para FileSessionDataStore. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=536018 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html • CWE-6: J2EE Misconfiguration: Insufficient Session-ID Length CWE-384: Session Fixation •
CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5045
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5045
NetApp OnCommand System Manager before 9.0 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive credentials via vectors related to cluster peering setup. NetApp OnCommand System Manager anterior la versión 9.0 permite a un atacante remoto obtener credenciales sensibles mediante los vectores relacionados a la configuración de pares del clúster. • https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/ka51A00000007OTQAY/NTAP-20170323-0001 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •