CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 147EXPL: 1CVE-2014-3566 – SSL/TLS: Padding Oracle On Downgraded Legacy Encryption attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3566
The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. El protocolo SSL 3.0, utilizado en OpenSSL hasta 1.0.1i y otros productos, utiliza relleno (padding) CBC no determinístico, lo que facilita a los atacantes man-in-the-middle obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de relleno (padding) oracle, también conocido como el problema "POODLE". A flaw was found in the way SSL 3.0 handled padding bytes when decrypting messages encrypted using block ciphers in cipher block chaining (CBC) mode. This flaw allows a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacker to decrypt a selected byte of a cipher text in as few as 256 tries if they are able to force a victim application to repeatedly send the same data over newly created SSL 3.0 connections. • https://github.com/mikesplain/CVE-2014-3566-poodle-cookbook ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-015.txt.asc http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0416.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory11.asc http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0101.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://askubuntu.com/questions/537196/how-do-i-patch-workaround-sslv3-poodle-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566 http& • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 96%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2014-0221 – openssl: DoS when sending invalid DTLS handshake
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0221
The dtls1_get_message_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (recursion and client crash) via a DTLS hello message in an invalid DTLS handshake. La función dtls1_get_message_fragment en d1_both.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0m y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1h permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (recursión y caída de cliente) a través de un mensaje DTLS hello en una negociación DTLS inválida. A denial of service flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled certain DTLS ServerHello requests. A specially crafted DTLS handshake packet could cause a DTLS client using OpenSSL to crash. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1053.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00016.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html http: • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 97%CPEs: 28EXPL: 3CVE-2014-0224 – openssl: SSL/TLS MITM vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0224
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0m y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1h no restringe debidamente el procesamiento de mensajes ChangeCipherSpec, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle provocar el uso de una clave maestra de longitud cero en ciertas comunicaciones OpenSSL-a-OpenSSL, y como consecuencia secuestrar sesiones u obtener información sensible, a través de una negociación TLS manipulada, también conocido como la vulnerabilidad de 'inyección CCS'. It was found that OpenSSL clients and servers could be forced, via a specially crafted handshake packet, to use weak keying material for communication. A man-in-the-middle attacker could use this flaw to decrypt and modify traffic between a client and a server. • https://github.com/secretnonempty/CVE-2014-0224 https://github.com/iph0n3/CVE-2014-0224 http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.asc http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp http://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/workbench/en/wb-news-6-1-7.html http://esupport.trendmicro.com/solution/en-US/1103813.aspx http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB29195 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/ • CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength CWE-841: Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 96%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2014-3470 – openssl: client-side denial of service when using anonymous ECDH
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-3470
The ssl3_send_client_key_exchange function in s3_clnt.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h, when an anonymous ECDH cipher suite is used, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and client crash) by triggering a NULL certificate value. La función ssl3_send_client_key_exchange en s3_clnt.c en OpenSSL anterior a 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 anterior a 1.0.0m y 1.0.1 anterior a 1.0.1h, cuando un suite de cifrado ECDH anónimo está utilizado, permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (referencia a puntero nulo y caída de cliente) mediante la provocación de un valor de certificado nulo. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory9.asc http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10629 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB29195 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136470.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-August/136473.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00016.html&# • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 97%CPEs: 54EXPL: 16CVE-2014-0160 – OpenSSL Information Disclosure Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-0160
The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory via crafted packets that trigger a buffer over-read, as demonstrated by reading private keys, related to d1_both.c and t1_lib.c, aka the Heartbleed bug. Las implementaciones de (1) TLS y (2) DTLS en OpenSSL 1.0.1 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1g no manejan adecuadamente paquetes Heartbeat Extension, lo que permite a atacantes remotos obtener información sensible desde la memoria de proceso a través de paquetes manipulados que desencadenan una sobrelectura del buffer, según lo demostrado mediante la lectura de claves privadas, relacionado con d1_both.c y t1_lib.c, también conocido como bug Heartbleed. An information disclosure flaw was found in the way OpenSSL handled TLS and DTLS Heartbeat Extension packets. A malicious TLS or DTLS client or server could send a specially crafted TLS or DTLS Heartbeat packet to disclose a limited portion of memory per request from a connected client or server. Note that the disclosed portions of memory could potentially include sensitive information such as private keys. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32764 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32791 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32998 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32745 https://github.com/0x90/CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/jdauphant/patch-openssl-CVE-2014-0160 https://github.com/caiqiqi/OpenSSL-HeartBleed-CVE-2014-0160-PoC https://github.com/obayesshelton/CVE-2014-0160-Scanner https://github.com/MrE-Fog/CVE-2014-0160-Chrome-Plugin https://github.com/Xyl2k/CVE-2014&# • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read CWE-201: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data •