CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7657 – jetty: HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7657
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), los fragmentos transfer-encoding se gestionan de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0910 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535668 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2018-12538
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12538
In Eclipse Jetty versions 9.4.0 through 9.4.8, when using the optional Jetty provided FileSessionDataStore for persistent storage of HttpSession details, it is possible for a malicious user to access/hijack other HttpSessions and even delete unmatched HttpSessions present in the FileSystem's storage for the FileSessionDataStore. En Eclipse Jetty, desde la versión 9.4.0 hasta la 9.4.8, al emplear el FileSessionDataStore opcional provisto por Jetty para el almacenamiento persistente de detalles HttpSession, es posible que un usuario malicioso acceda/secuestre otras HttpSessions e incluso elimine HttpSessions sin coincidencias presentes en el almacenamiento FileSystem para FileSessionDataStore. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=536018 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1b103833cb5bc8466e24ff0ecc5e75b45a705334ab6a444e64e840a0%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181014-0001 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2019-5072832.html • CWE-6: J2EE Misconfiguration: Insufficient Session-ID Length CWE-384: Session Fixation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 52%CPEs: 14EXPL: 1CVE-2018-12015 – perl: Directory traversal in Archive::Tar
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-12015
In Perl through 5.26.2, the Archive::Tar module allows remote attackers to bypass a directory-traversal protection mechanism, and overwrite arbitrary files, via an archive file containing a symlink and a regular file with the same name. En Perl hasta la versión 5.26.2, el módulo Archive::Tar permite que atacantes remotos omitan un mecanismo de protección de salto de directorio y sobrescriban archivos arbitrarios mediante un archivo comprimido que contiene un symlink y un archivo normal con el mismo nombre. It was found that the Archive::Tar module did not properly sanitize symbolic links when extracting tar archives. An attacker, able to provide a specially crafted archive for processing, could use this flaw to write or overwrite arbitrary files in the context of the Perl interpreter. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Mar/49 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104423 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041048 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2097 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900834 https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Mar/42 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20180927-0001 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT209600 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3684-1 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3684-2 https://www.debian.org/security/2018& • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-59: Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') •
CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-5372
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5372
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NetApp Snap Creator Framework before 4.3.0P1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. Vulnerabilidad de CSRF en NetApp Snap Creator Framework en versiones anteriores a 4.3.0P1 permite a atacantes remotos secuestrar la autenticación de usuarios para peticiones que tienen un impacto no especificado a través de vectores desconocidos. • https://kb.netapp.com/support/s/article/cve-2016-5372-cross-site-request-forgery-vulnerability-in-snap-creator-framework https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20160622-0001 • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) •
CVSS: 9.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 1CVE-2016-5018 – tomcat: security manager bypass via IntrospectHelper utility function
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-5018
In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 a malicious web application was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications. En Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 a 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 a 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 a 8.0.36, 7.0.0 a 7.0.70, y 6.0.0 a 6.0.45 una aplicación web maliciosa era capaz de omitir un SecurityManager configurado mediante un método utility Tomcat accesible para las aplicaciones web. It was discovered that a malicious web application could bypass a configured SecurityManager via a Tomcat utility method that was accessible to web applications. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/155873/Tomcat-9.0.0.M1-Sandbox-Escape.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0457.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1551.html http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3720 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/93942 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037142 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1038757 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0455 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0456 https://access.redhat.com/err •