CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 7%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1333 – DoS for HTTP/2 connections by crafted requests
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1333
By specially crafting HTTP/2 requests, workers would be allocated 60 seconds longer than necessary, leading to worker exhaustion and a denial of service. Fixed in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.34 (Affected 2.4.18-2.4.30,2.4.33). Al manipular especialmente las peticiones HTTP/2, los trabajadores se asignarían 60 segundos más de los necesarios, lo que conduce a un agotamiento de los trabajadores y a una denegación de servicio (DoS). Esto se ha solucionado en Apache HTTP Server 2.4.34 (2.4.18 - 2.4.30, 2.4.33 afectadas). • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041402 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0366 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0367 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html#CVE-2018-1333 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/84a3714f0878781f6ed84473d1a503d2cc382277e100450209231830%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.o • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 481EXPL: 0CVE-2018-3665 – Kernel: FPU state information leakage via lazy FPU restore
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3665
System software utilizing Lazy FP state restore technique on systems using Intel Core-based microprocessors may potentially allow a local process to infer data from another process through a speculative execution side channel. El software de sistema que emplea la técnica de restauración de estado Lazy FP en los sistemas que emplean microprocesadores de Intel Core podrían permitir que un proceso local infiera datos de otro proceso mediante un canal lateral de ejecución especulativa. A Floating Point Unit (FPU) state information leakage flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel saved and restored the FPU state during task switch. Linux kernels that follow the "Lazy FPU Restore" scheme are vulnerable to the FPU state information leakage issue. An unprivileged local attacker could use this flaw to read FPU state bits by conducting targeted cache side-channel attacks, similar to the Meltdown vulnerability disclosed earlier this year. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/104460 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041124 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1852 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:1944 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2165 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1170 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1190 https://help.ecostruxureit.com/display/public/UADCE725/Security+fixes& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 665EXPL: 5CVE-2018-3639 – AMD / ARM / Intel - Speculative Execution Variant 4 Speculative Store Bypass
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-3639
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and speculative execution of memory reads before the addresses of all prior memory writes are known may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis, aka Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. Los sistemas con microprocesadores que emplean la ejecución especulativa y que realizan la ejecución especulativa de lecturas de memoria antes de que se conozcan las direcciones de todas las anteriores escrituras de memoria podrían permitir la divulgación no autorizada de información a un atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de canal lateral. Esto también se conoce como Speculative Store Bypass (SSB), Variant 4. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of Load & Store instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). It relies on the presence of a precisely-defined instruction sequence in the privileged code as well as the fact that memory read from address to which a recent memory write has occurred may see an older value and subsequently cause an update into the microprocessor's data cache even for speculatively executed instructions that never actually commit (retire). • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44695 https://github.com/mmxsrup/CVE-2018-3639 https://github.com/Shuiliusheng/CVE-2018-3639-specter-v4- https://github.com/malindarathnayake/Intel-CVE-2018-3639-Mitigation_RegistryUpdate http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00058.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00059.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-09/msg00007.html http://support.lenovo.com/us/en/solutions/LEN-2213 • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1312 – httpd: Weak Digest auth nonce generation in mod_auth_digest
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1312
In Apache httpd 2.2.0 to 2.4.29, when generating an HTTP Digest authentication challenge, the nonce sent to prevent reply attacks was not correctly generated using a pseudo-random seed. In a cluster of servers using a common Digest authentication configuration, HTTP requests could be replayed across servers by an attacker without detection. En Apache httpd, en versiones desde la 2.2.0 hasta la 2.4.29, cuando se genera un desafío de autenticación HTTP Digest, el nonce enviado para evitar ataques replay no se generó correctamente empleando una semilla pseudoaleatoria. En un clúster de servidores, utilizando una configuración de autenticación Digest común, las peticiones HTTP se podrían reemplazar en los servidores por un atacante si que este sea detectado. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/03/24/7 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103524 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1040571 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:3558 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0366 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0367 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1898 https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/56c2e7cc9deb1c12a843d0dc251ea7fd3e7e80293cde02fcd65286ba%40%3Ccvs.httpd. • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness •
CVSS: 5.6EPSS: 97%CPEs: 1090EXPL: 3CVE-2017-5715 – Multiple CPUs - 'Spectre' Information Disclosure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-5715
Systems with microprocessors utilizing speculative execution and indirect branch prediction may allow unauthorized disclosure of information to an attacker with local user access via a side-channel analysis. Los sistemas con microprocesadores con ejecución especulativa y predicción indirecta de ramas podrían permitir la revelación no autorizada de información al atacante con acceso de usuario local mediante un análisis de un canal lateral. An industry-wide issue was found in the way many modern microprocessor designs have implemented speculative execution of instructions (a commonly used performance optimization). There are three primary variants of the issue which differ in the way the speculative execution can be exploited. Variant CVE-2017-5715 triggers the speculative execution by utilizing branch target injection. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/43427 https://github.com/GalloLuigi/Analisi-CVE-2017-5715 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00004.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-01/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •