CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 30EXPL: 0CVE-2015-1931 – JDK: plain text data stored in memory dumps
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-1931
IBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR1 FP10, 7 R1 before SR3 FP10, 7 before SR9 FP10, 6 R1 before SR8 FP7, 6 before SR16 FP7, and 5.0 before SR16 FP13 stores plaintext information in memory dumps, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading a file. IBM Java Security Components en IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 versiones anteriores a SR1 FP10, 7 R1 anteriores a SR3 FP10, 7 anteriores a SR9 FP10, 6 R1 anteriores a SR8 FP7, 6 anteriores a SR16 FP7, y 5.0 anteriores a SR16 FP13, almacena información de texto plano en volcados de memoria, lo que permite a usuarios locales obtener información confidencial al leer un archivo • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00051.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-09/msg00014.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1485.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1486.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1488.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1544.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1604.html http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IV75182 http://www-01.ibm&# • CWE-312: Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 160EXPL: 0CVE-2015-2808 – SSL/TLS: "Invariance Weakness" vulnerability in RC4 stream cipher
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-2808
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, does not properly combine state data with key data during the initialization phase, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks against the initial bytes of a stream by sniffing network traffic that occasionally relies on keys affected by the Invariance Weakness, and then using a brute-force approach involving LSB values, aka the "Bar Mitzvah" issue. El algoritmo RC4, utilizado en el protocolo TLS y el protocolo SSL, no combina correctamente los datos de estados con los datos de claves durante la fase de inicialización, lo que facilita a atacantes remotos realizar ataques de recuperación de texto claro contra los bytes iniciales de un flujo mediante la captura de trafico de la red que ocasionalmente depende de claves afectadas por la debilidad de la invariabilidad (Invariance Weakness), y posteriormente utilizar un acercamiento de fuerza bruta que involucra valores LSB, también conocido como el problema de 'Bar Mitzvah'. • http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04779034 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00013.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00014.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-06/msg00022.html • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 8.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 4CVE-2014-9322 – Linux Kernel - 'BadIRET' Local Privilege Escalation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-9322
arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S in the Linux kernel before 3.17.5 does not properly handle faults associated with the Stack Segment (SS) segment register, which allows local users to gain privileges by triggering an IRET instruction that leads to access to a GS Base address from the wrong space. arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S en el kernel de Linux anterior a 3.17.5 no maneja correctamente los fallos asociados con el registro de segmento Stack Segment (SS), lo que permite a usuarios locales ganar privilegios mediante la provocación de una instrucción IRET que lleva al acceso a una dirección de GS Base del espacio equivocado. A flaw was found in the way the Linux kernel handled GS segment register base switching when recovering from a #SS (stack segment) fault on an erroneous return to user space. A local, unprivileged user could use this flaw to escalate their privileges on the system. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/44205 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36266 https://github.com/RKX1209/CVE-2014-9322 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=6f442be2fb22be02cafa606f1769fa1e6f894441 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00025.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00015.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00020.html http://marc.info/?l= • CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management CWE-841: Improper Enforcement of Behavioral Workflow •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 89%CPEs: 345EXPL: 17CVE-2014-7169 – GNU Bourne-Again Shell (Bash) Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7169
GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to write to files or possibly have unknown other impact via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2014-6271. GNU Bash hasta 4.3 bash43-025 procesa cadenas finales después de la definición malformada de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos escribir hacia ficheros o posiblemente tener otro impacto desconocido a través de un entorno manipulado, tal y como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en la cual establecer el entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash. Nota: Esta vulnerabilidad existe debido a una solución incompleta para CVE-2014-6271. It was found that the fix for CVE-2014-6271 was incomplete, and Bash still allowed certain characters to be injected into other environments via specially crafted environment variables. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34766 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35115 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36933 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34765 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34860 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34879 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-228: Improper Handling of Syntactically Invalid Structure •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 345EXPL: 53CVE-2014-6271 – GNU Bourne-Again Shell (Bash) Arbitrary Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-6271
GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment, as demonstrated by vectors involving the ForceCommand feature in OpenSSH sshd, the mod_cgi and mod_cgid modules in the Apache HTTP Server, scripts executed by unspecified DHCP clients, and other situations in which setting the environment occurs across a privilege boundary from Bash execution, aka "ShellShock." NOTE: the original fix for this issue was incorrect; CVE-2014-7169 has been assigned to cover the vulnerability that is still present after the incorrect fix. GNU Bash hasta la versión 4.3 procesa cadenas finales después de las definiciones de funciones en los valores de variables de entorno, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de un entorno manipulado, tal como se ha demostrado por vectores que involucran la característica ForceCommand en sshd OpenSSH, los módulos mod_cgi y mod_cgid en el Apache HTTP Server, scripts ejecutados por clientes DHCP no especificados, y otras situaciones en las cuales el ajuste de entorno ocurre a través de un límite privilegiado de la ejecución de Bash, también conocido como "ShellShock." NOTA: la reparación original para este problema era incorrecta; CVE-2014-7169 ha sido asignada para cubrir la vulnerabilidad que todavía está presente después de la solución incorrecta. A flaw was found in the way Bash evaluated certain specially crafted environment variables. • https://github.com/darrenmartyn/visualdoor https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/38849 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34777 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/39918 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34895 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34839 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40619 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36503 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/36504 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40938 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/34900 https • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •