2 results (0.004 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Important: Authentication Bypass CVE-2023-41081 The mod_jk component of Apache Tomcat Connectors in some circumstances, such as when a configuration included "JkOptions +ForwardDirectories" but the configuration did not provide explicit mounts for all possible proxied requests, mod_jk would use an implicit mapping and map the request to the first defined worker. Such an implicit mapping could result in the unintended exposure of the status worker and/or bypass security constraints configured in httpd. As of JK 1.2.49, the implicit mapping functionality has been removed and all mappings must now be via explicit configuration. Only mod_jk is affected by this issue. The ISAPI redirector is not affected. This issue affects Apache Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk only): from 1.2.0 through 1.2.48. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.2.49, which fixes the issue. History 2023-09-13 Original advisory 2023-09-28 Updated summary Importante: Omisión de Autenticación CVE-2023-41081. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/28/7 https://lists.apache.org/thread/rd1r26w7271jyqgzr4492tooyt583d8b https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/09/msg00027.html https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/13/2 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-41081 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238847 • CWE-202: Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Data Queries •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

Apache Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk) before 1.2.41 ignores JkUnmount rules for subtrees of previous JkMount rules, which allows remote attackers to access otherwise restricted artifacts via unspecified vectors. Apache Tomcat Connectors (mod_jk) anterior a 1.2.41 ignora las reglas JkUnmount para los sunárboles de anteriores reglas JkMount, lo que permite a atacantes remotos acceder a artefactos de otra forma restringidos a través de vectores no especificados. It was discovered that a JkUnmount rule for a subtree of a previous JkMount rule could be ignored. This could allow a remote attacker to potentially access a private artifact in a tree that would otherwise not be accessible to them. • http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0846.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0847.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0848.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0849.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1641.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1642.html http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3278 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74265 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/277d42b48b6e9aef50949c0dcc79ce21693091d73da246b3c1981925%40%3Cdev.to • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •