CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 31%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0CVE-2021-44224 – Possible NULL dereference or SSRF in forward proxy configurations in Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44224
A crafted URI sent to httpd configured as a forward proxy (ProxyRequests on) can cause a crash (NULL pointer dereference) or, for configurations mixing forward and reverse proxy declarations, can allow for requests to be directed to a declared Unix Domain Socket endpoint (Server Side Request Forgery). This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.7 up to 2.4.51 (included). Un URI diseñado que es enviado a httpd configurado como proxy directo (ProxyRequests on) puede causar un fallo (desreferencia de puntero NULL) o, en el caso de configuraciones que mezclan declaraciones de proxy directo e inverso, puede permitir que las peticiones se dirijan a un endpoint de socket de dominio Unix declarado (Server Side Request Forgery). Este problema afecta a Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.7 hasta 2.4.51 (incluyéndola) There's a null pointer dereference and server-side request forgery flaw in httpd's mod_proxy module, when it is configured to be used as a forward proxy. A crafted packet could be sent on the adjacent network to the forward proxy that could cause a crash, or potentially SSRF via misdirected Unix Domain Socket requests. • http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/20/3 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BFSWOH4X77CV7AH7C4RMHUBDWKQDL4YH https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RGWILBORT67SHMSLYSQZG2NMXGCMPUZO https:// • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 10%CPEs: 35EXPL: 2CVE-2021-44790 – Possible buffer overflow when parsing multipart content in mod_lua of Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44790
A carefully crafted request body can cause a buffer overflow in the mod_lua multipart parser (r:parsebody() called from Lua scripts). The Apache httpd team is not aware of an exploit for the vulnerabilty though it might be possible to craft one. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.51 and earlier. Un cuerpo de petición cuidadosamente diseñado puede causar un desbordamiento de búfer en el analizador multiparte mod_lua (r:parsebody() llamado desde scripts Lua). El equipo de Apache httpd no presenta constancia de que se presente una explotación para esta vulnerabilidad, aunque podría ser posible diseñar uno. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51193 https://github.com/nuPacaChi/-CVE-2021-44790 http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171631/Apache-2.4.x-Buffer-Overflow.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/33 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/35 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2022/May/38 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/12/20/4 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 55EXPL: 1CVE-2019-19906 – cyrus-sasl: denial of service in _sasl_add_string function
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-19906
cyrus-sasl (aka Cyrus SASL) 2.1.27 has an out-of-bounds write leading to unauthenticated remote denial-of-service in OpenLDAP via a malformed LDAP packet. The OpenLDAP crash is ultimately caused by an off-by-one error in _sasl_add_string in common.c in cyrus-sasl. cyrus-sasl (también se conoce como Cyrus SASL) versión 2.1.27, presenta una escritura fuera de límites conllevando a una denegación de servicio remota no autenticada en OpenLDAP por medio de un paquete LDAP malformado. El bloqueo de OpenLDAP es causado en última instancia por un error por un paso en la función _sasl_add_string en el archivo common.c en cyrus-sasl. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Jul/23 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2020/Jul/24 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/23/4 https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/issues/587 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/12/msg00027.h • CWE-193: Off-by-one Error CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9513 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9513
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a los bucles de recursos, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante crea múltiples flujos de solicitud y baraja continuamente la prioridad de los flujos de una manera que provoca un cambio considerable en el árbol de prioridad. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2019/Aug/16 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2766 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2796 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2861 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2925 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2939 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2955 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •