CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 47EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1000613
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1000613
Legion of the Bouncy Castle Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography APIs 1.58 up to but not including 1.60 contains a CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in XMSS/XMSS^MT private key deserialization that can result in Deserializing an XMSS/XMSS^MT private key can result in the execution of unexpected code. This attack appear to be exploitable via A handcrafted private key can include references to unexpected classes which will be picked up from the class path for the executing application. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.60 and later. Las API Legion of the Bouncy Castle Java Cryptography de Legion of the Bouncy Castle en versiones hasta 1.58 pero sin incluir la versión 1.60, contiene una debilidad CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection'), vulnerabilidad en la deserialización de la clave privada XMSS/XMSS^MT que puede resultar en desrealizar una clave privada XMSS/XMSS^MT puede resultar en la ejecución de código inesperado. Este ataque parece ser explotable por medio de una clave privada artesanal que puede incluir referencias a clases inesperadas que se recogerán del class path para la aplicación en ejecución. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-05/msg00011.html https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/4092ede58da51af9a21e4825fbad0d9a3ef5a223#diff-2c06e2edef41db889ee14899e12bd574 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/cd98322b171b15b3f88c5ec871175147893c31e6#diff-148a6c098af0199192d6aede960f45dc https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf1bbc0ea4a9f014cf94df9a12a6477d24a27f52741dbc87f2fd52ff2%40%3Cissues.geode.apache.org%3E https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20190204-0003 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.or • CWE-470: Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 31EXPL: 0CVE-2018-1000180 – bouncycastle: flaw in the low-level interface to RSA key pair generator
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-1000180
Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 and earlier have a flaw in the Low-level interface to RSA key pair generator, specifically RSA Key Pairs generated in low-level API with added certainty may have less M-R tests than expected. This appears to be fixed in versions BC 1.60 beta 4 and later, BC-FJA 1.0.2 and later. Bouncy Castle BC 1.54 - 1.59, BC-FJA 1.0.0, BC-FJA 1.0.1 y anteriores tiene un vulnerabilidad en la interfaz de bajo nivel del generador de claves RSA; específicamente, los pares de claves RSA generados en la API de bajo nivel con un valor certainty añadido pueden tener menos tests M-R de lo esperado. Parece que se ha resuelto en versiones BC 1.60 beta 4 y posteriores y BC-FJA 1.0.2 y posteriores. A vulnerability was found in BouncyCastle. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/106567 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2423 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2424 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2425 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2428 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2643 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0877 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/22467b6e8fe19717ecdf201c0cf91bacf04a55ad https://github.com/bcgit/ • CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1000344 – bouncycastle: DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1000344
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. En la versión 1.55 y anteriores de Bouncy Castle JCE Provider, la implementación DHIES permitía el uso del modo ECB. Este modo se considera inseguro y el fabricante le ha retirado el soporte. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/9385b0ebd277724b167fe1d1456e3c112112be1f https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181127-0004 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1000344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588314 • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1000345 – bouncycastle: DHIES/ECIES CBC modes are vulnerable to padding oracle attack
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1000345
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES/ECIES CBC mode vulnerable to padding oracle attack. For BC 1.55 and older, in an environment where timings can be easily observed, it is possible with enough observations to identify when the decryption is failing due to padding. En Bouncy Castle JCE Provider, en versiones 1.55 y anteriores, el modo DHIES/ECIES CBC es vulnerable a ataques de oráculo de relleno. Para BC 1.55 y anteriores, en un entorno en el que las sincronizaciones pueden observarse fácilmente, es posible identificar con la suficiente atención en qué punto falla el descifrado debido al relleno. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/21dcb3d9744c83dcf2ff8fcee06dbca7bfa4ef35#diff-4439ce586bf9a13bfec05c0d113b8098 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00009.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181127-0004 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3727-1 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1000345 https://bugzilla.redhat.com • CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step CWE-361: 7PK - Time and State •
CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2016-1000346 – bouncycastle: Other party DH public keys are not fully validated
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-1000346
In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the other party DH public key is not fully validated. This can cause issues as invalid keys can be used to reveal details about the other party's private key where static Diffie-Hellman is in use. As of release 1.56 the key parameters are checked on agreement calculation. En Bouncy Castle JCE Provider, en versiones 1.55 y anteriores, no se valida completamente la clave pública DH de la otra parte. Esto puede causar problemas, ya que las claves inválidas pueden emplearse para revelar detalles sobre la clave privada de la otra parte donde se emplea Diffie-Hellman estático. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2669 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927 https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/commit/1127131c89021612c6eefa26dbe5714c194e7495#diff-d525a20b8acaed791ae2f0f770eb5937 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/07/msg00009.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20181127-0004 https://usn.ubuntu.com/3727-1 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1000346 https://bugzilla.redhat.com • CWE-320: Key Management Errors CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •