12 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1

The expand function in fio.c in Heirloom mailx 12.5 and earlier and BSD mailx 8.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in an email address. La función extendida en fio.c en Heirloom mailx 12.5 y anteriores y BSD mailx 8.1.2 y anteriores permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar comandos arbitrarios a través metacaracteres de shell en una dirección de correo electrónico. A flaw was found in the way mailx handled the parsing of email addresses. A syntactically valid email address could allow a local attacker to cause mailx to execute arbitrary shell commands through shell meta-characters (CVE-2004-2771) and the direct command execution functionality (CVE-2014-7844). • http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1999.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1999.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q4/1066 http://secunia.com/advisories/60940 http://secunia.com/advisories/61585 http://secunia.com/advisories/61693 http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3105 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=278748 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2004-2771 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162783 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 24EXPL: 0

BSD mailx 8.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted email address. BSD mailx versión 8.1.2 y anteriores, permiten a atacantes remotos ejecutar comandos arbitrarios por medio de una dirección de correo electrónico diseñada. A flaw was found in the way mailx handled the parsing of email addresses. A syntactically valid email address could allow a local attacker to cause mailx to execute arbitrary shell commands through shell meta-characters (CVE-2004-2771) and the direct command execution functionality (CVE-2014-7844). • http://linux.oracle.com/errata/ELSA-2014-1999.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1999.html http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2014/q4/1066 http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3104 http://www.debian.org/security/2014/dsa-3105 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7844 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162783 • CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0

The TCP stack in 4.3BSD Net/2, as used in FreeBSD 5.4, NetBSD possibly 2.0, and OpenBSD possibly 3.6, does not properly implement the session timer, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via crafted packets. La pila de TCP en 4.3BSD Net/2, utilizado en FreeBSD 5.4, NetBSD posiblemente 2.0, y OpenBSD posiblemente 3.6, no implementa correctamente el temporizador de la sesión, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos) a través de paquetes manipulados. • http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN07930208/index.html http://jvndb.jvn.jp/jvndb/JVNDB-2014-000134 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195243 • CWE-399: Resource Management Errors •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 2049EXPL: 0

The TCP implementation in (1) Linux, (2) platforms based on BSD Unix, (3) Microsoft Windows, (4) Cisco products, and probably other operating systems allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection queue exhaustion) via multiple vectors that manipulate information in the TCP state table, as demonstrated by sockstress. La implementación del protocolo TCP en (1) Linux, (2) plataformas basadas en BSD Unix, (3) Microsoft Windows, (4) productos Cisco, y probablemente otros sistemas operativos, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (agotamiento de cola de conexión) a través de múltiples vectores que manipulan información en la tabla de estados del TCP, como lo demuestra sockstress. • http://blog.robertlee.name/2008/10/conjecture-speculation.html http://insecure.org/stf/tcp-dos-attack-explained.html http://lists.immunitysec.com/pipermail/dailydave/2008-October/005360.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=125856010926699&w=2 http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com.au/articles/27154-TCP-is-fundamentally-borked http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080af511d.shtml http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a0080a15120.html http://www.cpni • CWE-16: Configuration •

CVSS: 6.8EPSS: 16%CPEs: 9EXPL: 2

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in freePBX 2.2.x allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) From, (2) To, (3) Call-ID, (4) User-Agent, and unspecified other SIP protocol fields, which are stored in /var/log/asterisk/full and displayed by admin/modules/logfiles/asterisk-full-log.php. Múltiples vulnerabilidades de secuencia de comandos en sitios cruzados (XSS) en freePBX 2.2.x permite a atacantes remotos inyectar secuencias de comandos web o HTML a través de los campos (1) From, (2) To, (3) Call-ID, (4) User-Agent, y otros no especificados del protocolo SIP, lo cuales son almacenados en /var/log/asterisk/full y mostrados por admin/modules/logfiles/asterisk-full-log.php. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/29873 http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-April/053882.html http://osvdb.org/35315 http://secunia.com/advisories/24935 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2627 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23575 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1535 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33772 •