CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 16%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2014-6310
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-6310
22 Nov 2019 — Buffer overflow in CHICKEN 4.9.0 and 4.9.0.1 may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via the 'select' function. Un desbordamiento de búfer en CHICKEN versiones 4.9.0 y 4.9.0.1, puede permitir a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario por medio de la función "select". • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/09/11/6 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2012-6125
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-6125
31 Oct 2019 — Chicken before 4.8.0 is susceptible to algorithmic complexity attacks related to hash table collisions. Chicken versiones anteriores a 4.8.0, es susceptible a ataques de complejidad algorítmica relacionados con colisiones de tablas hash. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/08/2 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2012-6124
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-6124
31 Oct 2019 — A casting error in Chicken before 4.8.0 on 64-bit platform caused the random number generator to return a constant value. NOTE: the vendor states "This function wasn't used for security purposes (and is advertised as being unsuitable)." Un error de conversión en Chicken versiones anteriores a 4.8.0, en la plataforma de 64 bits causó que el generador de números aleatorios devolviera un valor constante. NOTA: el proveedor declara "This function wasn't used for security purposes (and is advertised as being uns... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/08/2 • CWE-338: Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG) •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2012-6123
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-6123
31 Oct 2019 — Chicken before 4.8.0 does not properly handle NUL bytes in certain strings, which allows an attacker to conduct "poisoned NUL byte attack." Chicken versiones anteriores a 4.8.0, no maneja apropiadamente los bytes NUL en determinadas cadenas, lo que permite a un atacante conducir un "poisoned NUL byte attack." • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/08/2 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 2%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2012-6122
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-6122
31 Oct 2019 — Buffer overflow in the thread scheduler in Chicken before 4.8.0.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by opening a file descriptor with a large integer value. Un desbordamiento de búfer en el programador de subprocesos (hilos) en Chicken versiones anteriores a 4.8.0.1, permite a atacantes causar una denegación de servicio (bloqueo) mediante la apertura de un descriptor de archivo con un valor entero grande. • http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2013-10/msg00000.html • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2013-2075
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-2075
31 Oct 2019 — Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) R5RS char-ready, (2) tcp-accept-ready, and (3) file-select procedures in Chicken through 4.8.0.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by opening a file descriptor with a large integer value. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-6122. Múltiples desbordamientos del búfer en los procedimientos (1) R5RS char-ready, (2) tcp-accept-ready y (3) file-select en Chicken versiones hasta 4.8.0.3, permiten a atacantes causar una denegació... • http://code.call-cc.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=chicken-core.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=556108092774086b6c86c2e27daf3f740ffec091 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2017-11343
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-11343
16 Jul 2017 — Due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-6125, all versions of CHICKEN Scheme up to and including 4.12.0 are vulnerable to an algorithmic complexity attack. An attacker can provide crafted input which, when inserted into the symbol table, will result in O(n) lookup time. Debido a una solución incompleta para el CVE-2012-6125, todas las versiones de CHICKEN Scheme hasta 4.12.0 incluyéndola, son vulnerables a un ataque de complejidad algorítmica. Un atacante puede proporcionar una entrada creada que, cuando sea ... • http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2017-07/msg00000.html • CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2017-9334
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-9334
01 Jun 2017 — An incorrect "pair?" check in the Scheme "length" procedure results in an unsafe pointer dereference in all CHICKEN Scheme versions prior to 4.13, which allows an attacker to cause a denial of service by passing an improper list to an application that calls "length" on it. Un chequeo de "pair" incorrecto en el procedimiento "lenght" de Scheme resulta en una desreferencia de puntero insegura en todas las versiones de CHICKEN Scheme anteriores a 4.13, lo que permite a un atacante causar una denegación de serv... • http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2017-05/msg00000.html • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-6830
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-6830
10 Jan 2017 — The "process-execute" and "process-spawn" procedures in CHICKEN Scheme used fixed-size buffers for holding the arguments and environment variables to use in its execve() call. This would allow user-supplied argument/environment variable lists to trigger a buffer overrun. This affects all releases of CHICKEN up to and including 4.11 (it will be fixed in 4.12 and 5.0, which are not yet released). Los procedimientos "process-execute" y "process-spawn" en CHICKEN Scheme utilizaron búfers de tamaño fijo para man... • http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2016-08/msg00001.html • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2016-6831
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-6831
10 Jan 2017 — The "process-execute" and "process-spawn" procedures did not free memory correctly when the execve() call failed, resulting in a memory leak. This could be abused by an attacker to cause resource exhaustion or a denial of service. This affects all releases of CHICKEN up to and including 4.11 (it will be fixed in 4.12 and 5.0, which are not yet released). Los procedimientos "process-execute" y "process-spawn" no liberan correctamente la memoria cuando falla la llamada execve(), resultando en una perdida de m... • http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2016-08/msg00001.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •