4 results (0.003 seconds)

CVSS: 7.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 1

Local user may lead to privilege escalation using Gaia Portal hostnames page. Checkpoint Gaia Portal version R81.10 suffers from a remote command execution vulnerability. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/173918/Checkpoint-Gaia-Portal-R81.10-Remote-Command-Execution.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Aug/4 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2023/Jul/43 https://pentests.nl/pentest-blog/cve-2023-28130-command-injection-in-check-point-gaia-portal https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk181311 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') •

CVSS: 6.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0

The Check Point Gaia Portal's GUI Clients allowed authenticated administrators with permission for the GUI Clients settings to inject a command that would run on the Gaia OS. Los Clientes GUI del Portal Gaia de Check Point permitían a administradores autenticados con permiso para la configuración de los Clientes GUI inyectar un comando que sería ejecutado en el Sistema Operativo Gaia • https://supportcontent.checkpoint.com/solutions?id=sk179128 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

In a rare scenario, Check Point R80.30 Security Gateway before JHF Take 50 managed by Check Point R80.30 Management crashes with a unique configuration of enhanced logging. En un escenario extraño, Check Point R80.30 Security Gateway anterior a JHF Take 50 administrada por Check Point R80.30 Management, se bloquea con una configuración única de registro mejorado. • https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk153152 https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk161812 • CWE-755: Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions •

CVSS: 5.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

The OSPF implementation in Check Point Gaia OS R75.X and R76 and IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X and R76 does not consider the possibility of duplicate Link State ID values in Link State Advertisement (LSA) packets before performing operations on the LSA database, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (routing disruption) or obtain sensitive packet information via a crafted LSA packet, a related issue to CVE-2013-0149. La implementación OSPF en Check Point Gaia OS R75.X y R76 e IPSO OS 6.2 R75.X y R76 no considera la posibilidad de valores Link State ID duplicados en paquetes Link State Advertisement (LSA) antes de realizar operaciones en la base de datos LSA, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (interrupción de enrutamiento) u obtener información sensible de paquetes a través de un paquete LSA manipulado, una vulnerabilidad relacionada con CVE-2013-0149. • http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/229804 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/BLUU-985QRC https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk94490 •