CVE-2008-5849
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-5849
Check Point VPN-1 R55, R65, and other versions, when Port Address Translation (PAT) is used, allows remote attackers to discover intranet IP addresses via a packet with a small TTL, which triggers an ICMP_TIMXCEED_INTRANS (aka ICMP time exceeded in-transit) response containing an encapsulated IP packet with an intranet address, as demonstrated by a TCP packet to the firewall management server on port 18264. Check Point VPN-1 R55, R65, y otras versiones, cuando la traducción de direcciones de puerto (PAT) es utilizada, permite a atacantes remotos conocer las direcciones IP de la intranet a través de un paquete con un pequeño TTL, que lanza una respuesta ICMP_TIMXCEED_INTRANS (también conocido como ICMP time exceeded in-transit)que contiene un paquete IP encapsulado con una dirección de intranet, como lo demuestra un paquete TCP al servidor de gestión del cortafuegos en el puerto 18264. • http://secunia.com/advisories/32728 http://www.portcullis-security.com/293.php http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32306 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/3229 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46645 https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solutionid=sk36321 https://svn.wald.intevation.org/svn/openvas/trunk/openvas-plugins/scripts/checkpoint-vpn1-pat-information-disclosure.nasl • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor •
CVE-2008-1397
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-1397
Check Point VPN-1 Power/UTM, with NGX R60 through R65 and NG AI R55 software, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (site-to-site VPN tunnel outage), and possibly intercept network traffic, by configuring the local RFC1918 IP address to be the same as one of this tunnel's endpoint RFC1918 IP addresses, and then using SecuRemote to connect to a network interface at the other endpoint. Check Point VPN-1 Power/UTM, con NGX R60 hasta R65 y el software NG AI R55, permite a usuarios remotos autenticados provocar una denegación de servicio (parada del túnel VPN sitio a sitio), y posiblemente interceptar tráfico de red, por la configuración de la dirección IP local RFC1918 al ser la misma que una de estas direcciones IP RFC1918 del punto final del túnel, y utilizando SecuRemote para conectar a una interfaz de red en el otro punto final. • http://puresecurity.com.au/index.php?action=fullnews&id=5 http://secunia.com/advisories/29394 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/992585 http://www.puresecurity.com.au/files/PureSecurity%20VPN-1%20DoS_Spoofing%20Attack%20against%20VPN%20tunnels.pdf http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28299 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1019666 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/0953/references https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/41260 https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVE-2004-0040
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0040
Stack-based buffer overflow in Check Point VPN-1 Server 4.1 through 4.1 SP6 and Check Point SecuRemote/SecureClient 4.1 through 4.1 build 4200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ISAKMP packet with a large Certificate Request packet. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en la pila en Checkpoint VPN-1 Server 4.1 a 4.1 SP6 y Checkpoint SecuRemote/SecureClient 4.1 a 4.1 compilación 4200 pemite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario mediante un paquete ISAKMP con un paquete de Petición de Certificado muy grande. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=107604682227031&w=2 http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/o-073.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/873334 http://www.osvdb.org/3821 http://www.osvdb.org/4432 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9582 http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/alerts/id/163 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/14150 •