CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2011-1827
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2011-1827
05 Oct 2011 — Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Check Point SSL Network Extender (SNX), SecureWorkSpace, and Endpoint Security On-Demand, as distributed by SecurePlatform, IPSO6, Connectra, and VSX, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors involving a (1) ActiveX control or (2) Java applet. Múltiples vulnerabilidades sin especificar en Check Point SSL Network Extender (SNX), SecureWorkSpace y Endpoint Security On-Demand, como se distribuye en SecurePlatform, IPSO6, Connectra and VSX. Permite a a... • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47695 •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 8%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1CVE-2008-1397
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2008-1397
20 Mar 2008 — Check Point VPN-1 Power/UTM, with NGX R60 through R65 and NG AI R55 software, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (site-to-site VPN tunnel outage), and possibly intercept network traffic, by configuring the local RFC1918 IP address to be the same as one of this tunnel's endpoint RFC1918 IP addresses, and then using SecuRemote to connect to a network interface at the other endpoint. Check Point VPN-1 Power/UTM, con NGX R60 hasta R65 y el software NG AI R55, permite a usuarios remot... • http://puresecurity.com.au/index.php?action=fullnews&id=5 • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 9%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2005-3673
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-3673
18 Nov 2005 — The Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementation in Check Point products allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via certain crafted IKE packets, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. • http://jvn.jp/niscc/NISCC-273756/index.html •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 17%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0699
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0699
14 Sep 2004 — Heap-based buffer overflow in ASN.1 decoding library in Check Point VPN-1 products, when Aggressive Mode IKE is implemented, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by initiating an IKE negotiation and then sending an IKE packet with malformed ASN.1 data. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en el montón en la librería de decodificación ASN.1 de productos CheckPoint VPN-1, cuando se ha implementado IKE agresivo, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección iniciando una negociación IKE y e... • http://secunia.com/advisories/12177 •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 6%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0469
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0469
14 May 2004 — Buffer overflow in the ISAKMP functionality for Check Point VPN-1 and FireWall-1 NG products, before VPN-1/FireWall-1 R55 HFA-03, R54 HFA-410 and NG FP3 HFA-325, or VPN-1 SecuRemote/SecureClient R56, may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code during VPN tunnel negotiation. Desbordamiento de búfer en la funcionalidad ISAKMP de los productos Check Point VPN-1 y FireWall-1 NG, anteriores a VPN-1/FireWall-1 R55 HFA-03, R54 HFA-410 y NG FP3 HFA-325, o VPN-1 SecuRemote/SecureClient R56, puede permitir a... • http://www.checkpoint.com/techsupport/alerts/ike_vpn.html •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 5%CPEs: 252EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0079
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0079
18 Mar 2004 — The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference. La función do_change_cipher_spec en OpenSSL 0.9.6c hasta 0.9.6.k y 0.9.7a hasta 0.9.7c permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una denegación de servicio (caída) mediante una hábil unión SSL/TLS que provoca un puntero nulo. • ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-04:05.openssl.asc • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 3%CPEs: 252EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0081
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0081
18 Mar 2004 — OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. OpenSSL 0.9.6 anteriores a la 0.9.6d no manejan adecuadamente los tipos de mensajes desconocidos, lo que permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicios (por bucle infinito), como se demuestra utilizando la herramienta de testeo Codenomicon TLS. • ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/OpenServer/SCOSA-2004.10/SCOSA-2004.10.txt •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 245EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0112
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0112
18 Mar 2004 — The SSL/TLS handshaking code in OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, and 0.9.7c, when using Kerberos ciphersuites, does not properly check the length of Kerberos tickets during a handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that causes an out-of-bounds read. El código que une SSL/TLS en OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b y 0.9.7c, usando Kerberos, no comprueba adecuadamente la longitud de los tickets de Kerberos, lo que permite que atacantes remotos provoquen una dene... • ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2004-005.txt.asc • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 25%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2004-0040
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2004-0040
03 Mar 2004 — Stack-based buffer overflow in Check Point VPN-1 Server 4.1 through 4.1 SP6 and Check Point SecuRemote/SecureClient 4.1 through 4.1 build 4200 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an ISAKMP packet with a large Certificate Request packet. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en la pila en Checkpoint VPN-1 Server 4.1 a 4.1 SP6 y Checkpoint SecuRemote/SecureClient 4.1 a 4.1 compilación 4200 pemite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario mediante un paquete ISAKMP con un paquete de Petición de... • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=107604682227031&w=2 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 75%CPEs: 2EXPL: 2CVE-2002-1623
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-1623
31 Dec 2002 — The design of the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) protocol, when using Aggressive Mode for shared secret authentication, does not encrypt initiator or responder identities during negotiation, which may allow remote attackers to determine valid usernames by (1) monitoring responses before the password is supplied or (2) sniffing, as originally reported for FireWall-1 SecuRemote. • http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2002-September/001223.html •