15 results (0.004 seconds)

CVSS: 4.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 52EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the client forwarding code of multiple Cisco Access Points (APs) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to inject packets from the native VLAN to clients within nonnative VLANs on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to a logic error on the AP that forwards packets that are destined to a wireless client if they are received on the native VLAN. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by obtaining access to the native VLAN and directing traffic directly to the client through their MAC/IP combination. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass VLAN separation and potentially also bypass any Layer 3 protection mechanisms that are deployed. Una vulnerabilidad en el código de reenvío de clientes de varios Puntos de Acceso (AP) de Cisco podría permitir a un atacante adyacente no autenticado inyectar paquetes de la VLAN nativa a clientes dentro de VLANs no nativas en un dispositivo afectado. • https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-apvlan-TDTtb4FY • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 95EXPL: 0

A vulnerability in the SSH management feature of multiple Cisco Access Points (APs) platforms could allow a local, authenticated user to modify files on the affected device and possibly gain escalated privileges. The vulnerability is due to improper checking on file operations within the SSH management interface. A network administrator user could exploit this vulnerability by accessing an affected device through SSH management to make a configuration change. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain privileges equivalent to the root user. Una vulnerabilidad en la función de administración SSH de varias plataformas Cisco Access Points (APs), podría permitir a un usuario local autenticado modificar archivos en el dispositivo afectado y posiblemente alcanzar privilegios escalados. • https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-cisco-ap-LLjsGxv • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •

CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 330EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in the kernel in NetBSD 7.1. An Access Point (AP) forwards EAPOL frames to other clients even though the sender has not yet successfully authenticated to the AP. This might be abused in projected Wi-Fi networks to launch denial-of-service attacks against connected clients and makes it easier to exploit other vulnerabilities in connected clients. Se detectó un problema en el kernel en NetBSD versión 7.1. Un punto de acceso (AP) reenvía tramas EAPOL a otros clientes aunque el remitente aún no se haya autenticado con éxito en el AP. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/11/12 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-913875.pdf https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks/blob/master/SUMMARY.md https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00019.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00020.html https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wifi-faf-22epcEWu https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12602-s • CWE-287: Improper Authentication CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere •

CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 408EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The WEP, WPA, WPA2, and WPA3 implementations accept plaintext frames in a protected Wi-Fi network. An adversary can abuse this to inject arbitrary data frames independent of the network configuration. Se detectó un problema en el controlador ALFA de Windows 10 versión 6.1316.1209 para AWUS036H. Las implementaciones WEP, WPA, WPA2 y WPA3 aceptan tramas de texto plano en una red Wi-Fi protegida. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/11/12 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-913875.pdf https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks/blob/master/SUMMARY.md https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wifi-faf-22epcEWu https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12602-security-advisory-63 https://www.fragattacks.com https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-26140 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show&# • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-346: Origin Validation Error •

CVSS: 3.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 338EXPL: 1

The 802.11 standard that underpins Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, and WPA3) and Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) doesn't require that all fragments of a frame are encrypted under the same key. An adversary can abuse this to decrypt selected fragments when another device sends fragmented frames and the WEP, CCMP, or GCMP encryption key is periodically renewed. El estándar 802.11 que sustenta a Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA, WPA2, y WPA3) y Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP) no requiere que todos los fragmentos de una trama estén cifrados con la misma clave. Un adversario puede abusar de esto para descifrar fragmentos seleccionados cuando otro dispositivo envía tramas fragmentadas y la clave de cifrado WEP, CCMP o GCMP es periódicamente renovada A flaw was found in the Linux kernel's WiFi implementation. An attacker within the wireless range can abuse a logic flaw in the WiFi implementation by reassembling packets from multiple fragments under different keys, treating them as valid. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/05/11/12 https://github.com/vanhoefm/fragattacks/blob/master/SUMMARY.md https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00019.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00020.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00002.html https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-wifi-faf-22epcEWu https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisories/12 • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity •