7 results (0.004 seconds)

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0

Race condition in the SSL implementation on Cisco Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) devices allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by making many management-interface HTTPS connections during the key-regeneration phase of an upgrade, aka Bug ID CSCui25688. Condición de carrera en la implementación SSL en los dispositivos Cisco Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) permite a atacantes remotos causar una denegación de servicio al hacer muchas conexiones HTTPS de la interfaz de gestión durante la fase de la regeneración de claves de una actualización, también conocido como Bug ID CSCui25688. • http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2015-0631 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/72700 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031780 • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 2%CPEs: 22EXPL: 1

Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.4 allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (device restart and BGP routing table rebuild) via certain regular expressions in a "show ip bgp regexp" command. NOTE: unauthenticated remote attacks are possible in environments with anonymous telnet and Looking Glass access. Una vulnerabilidad no especificada en Cisco IOS versiones 12.0 hasta 12.4, permite a atacantes dependiendo del contexto causar una denegación de servicio (reinicio del dispositivo y reconstrucción de la tabla de enrutamiento BGP) por medio de ciertas expresiones regulares en un comando "show ip bgp regexp". NOTA: los ataques remotos no autenticados son posibles en entornos con acceso anónimo a telnet y Looking Glass. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/30506 http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Network%20Infrastructure&topic=WAN%2C%20Routing%20and%20Switching&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1ddf7bc9 http://secunia.com/advisories/26798 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_response09186a00808bb91c.html http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/94526 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/25352 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1018685 http://www.vupen.com/english/a • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 4%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

The web administration interface (mainApp) to Cisco IDS before 4.1(5c), and IPS 5.0 before 5.0(6p1) and 5.1 before 5.1(2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (unresponsive device) via a crafted SSLv2 Client Hello packet. La interfaz web(mainApp)para administrar a Cisco IDS nateriores a 4.1(5c), e IPS 5.0 anteriores a 5.0(6p1) y 5.1 anteriores a 5.1(2)permite a un atacante remoto provocar una denegación de servicio (dispositivo sin respuesta) a través de un paquete artesanal SSLv2 Client Hello. • http://secunia.com/advisories/22046 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016891 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20060920-ips.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/642076 http://www.osvdb.org/29037 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20124 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3721 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/29056 •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 5%CPEs: 138EXPL: 0

Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1 protocol, as implemented on Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, and PIX firewalls, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource exhaustion) via a flood of IKE Phase-1 packets that exceed the session expiration rate. NOTE: it has been argued that this is due to a design weakness of the IKE version 1 protocol, in which case other vendors and implementations would also be affected. Protocolo Internet Key Exchange (IKE) version 1, implementado para Cisco IOS, VPN 3000 Concentrators, y PIX firewalls, permite a atacantes remotos provocar denegación de servicio (agotamiento de recursos) a través de un flood de paquetes IKE Phase-1 que exceden el ratio de expiración de la sesión. NOTA: se ha indicado que esto es debido a un diseño debil del protocolo IKe version 1, en cuyo caso otros vendedores e implementaciones podrían verse afectados. • http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2006-07/0531.html http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1293 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016582 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/tsd_technology_security_response09186a00806f33d4.html http://www.nta-monitor.com/posts/2006/07/cisco-concentrator-dos.html http://www.osvdb.org/29068 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/441203/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19176 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities& •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 156EXPL: 0

The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS. • http://secunia.com/advisories/18141 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_field_notice09186a00805bf1c4.shtml http://www.osvdb.org/22193 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420020/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420103/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16025 •