CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 398EXPL: 30CVE-2021-44228 – Apache Log4j2 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44228
Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. • https://github.com/fullhunt/log4j-scan https://github.com/Puliczek/CVE-2021-44228-PoC-log4j-bypass-words https://github.com/cyberstruggle/L4sh https://github.com/woodpecker-appstore/log4j-payload-generator https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/apache-log4j-poc https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51183 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50592 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50590 https://github.com/logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner https://github.com/jas502n/Log4j2-CVE-2021-44228 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 10EXPL: 0CVE-2013-3466
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2013-3466
The EAP-FAST authentication module in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) 4.x before 4.2.1.15.11, when a RADIUS server configuration is enabled, does not properly parse user identities, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted EAP-FAST packets, aka Bug ID CSCui57636. El módulo de autenticación EAP-FAST en Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) v4.x anterior a v4.2.1.15.11, cuando la configuración de servidor RADIUS está habilitada, no analiza correctamente las identidades de usuario, lo que permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario a través de paquetes manipulados EAP-FAST, también conocido como Bug ID CSCui57636. • http://osvdb.org/96668 http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20130828-acs http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1028958 • CWE-287: Improper Authentication •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 10%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2007-0105
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2007-0105
Stack-based buffer overflow in the CSAdmin service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTTP GET request. Desbordamiento de búfer basado en pila en el servicio CSAdmin de Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) para Windows anterior a 4.1 y ACS Solution Engine anterior a 4.1 permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código de su elección mediante una petición HTTP GET manipulada. • http://secunia.com/advisories/23629 http://securitytracker.com/id?1017475 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070105-csacs.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/744249 http://www.osvdb.org/32642 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21900 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0068 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/31323 •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2006-4097
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2006-4097
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the CSRadius service in Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) for Windows before 4.1 and ACS Solution Engine before 4.1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted RADIUS Access-Request packet. NOTE: it has been reported that at least one issue is a heap-based buffer overflow involving the Tunnel-Password attribute. Múltiples vulnerabilidades no especificadas en el servicio CSRadius de Cisco Secure Access Control Server (ACS) para Windows anetrior a 4.1 y ACS Solution Engine anterior a 4.1 permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída) mediante un paquete de solicitud de acceso RADIUS (RADIUS Access-Request) manipulado. • http://osvdb.org/36125 http://secunia.com/advisories/23629 http://securitytracker.com/id?1017475 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sa-20070105-csacs.shtml http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/443108 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/21900 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/0068 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/31334 •