CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 83%CPEs: 444EXPL: 7CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 10.0EPSS: 96%CPEs: 398EXPL: 30CVE-2021-44228 – Apache Log4j2 Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44228
Apache Log4j2 2.0-beta9 through 2.15.0 (excluding security releases 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1) JNDI features used in configuration, log messages, and parameters do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints. An attacker who can control log messages or log message parameters can execute arbitrary code loaded from LDAP servers when message lookup substitution is enabled. From log4j 2.15.0, this behavior has been disabled by default. From version 2.16.0 (along with 2.12.2, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1), this functionality has been completely removed. Note that this vulnerability is specific to log4j-core and does not affect log4net, log4cxx, or other Apache Logging Services projects. • https://github.com/fullhunt/log4j-scan https://github.com/Puliczek/CVE-2021-44228-PoC-log4j-bypass-words https://github.com/cyberstruggle/L4sh https://github.com/woodpecker-appstore/log4j-payload-generator https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/apache-log4j-poc https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51183 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50592 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/50590 https://github.com/logpresso/CVE-2021-44228-Scanner https://github.com/jas502n/Log4j2-CVE-2021-44228 h • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2012-5424
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2012-5424
Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) 5.x before 5.2 Patch 11 and 5.3 before 5.3 Patch 7, when a certain configuration involving TACACS+ and LDAP is used, does not properly validate passwords, which allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending a valid username and a crafted password string, aka Bug ID CSCuc65634. Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) v5.x antes v5.2 Patch 11 y v5.3 antes de 5.3 Patch 7, cuando se usa una determinada configuración que implica TACACS+ y LDAP, no valida correctamente las contraseñas, lo que permite a atacantes remotos evitar la autenticación mediante el envío de un nombre de usuario válido y una contraseña modificada a mano. Se trata de un problema también conocido como Bug ID CSCuc65634. • http://osvdb.org/87251 http://secunia.com/advisories/51194 http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20121107-acs http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/56433 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027733 https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79860 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 156EXPL: 0CVE-2005-4499
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-4499
The Downloadable RADIUS ACLs feature in Cisco PIX and VPN 3000 concentrators, when creating an ACL on the Cisco Secure Access Control Server (CS ACS), generates a random internal name for an ACL that is also used as a hidden user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain privileges by sniffing the username from the cleartext portion of a RADIUS session, then using the password to log in to another device that uses CS ACS. • http://secunia.com/advisories/18141 http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_field_notice09186a00805bf1c4.shtml http://www.osvdb.org/22193 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420020/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/420103/100/0/threaded http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16025 •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 93%CPEs: 296EXPL: 2CVE-2005-0356 – TCP TIMESTAMPS - Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2005-0356
Multiple TCP implementations with Protection Against Wrapped Sequence Numbers (PAWS) with the timestamps option enabled allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection loss) via a spoofed packet with a large timer value, which causes the host to discard later packets because they appear to be too old. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/1008 ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-05:15.tcp.asc ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/updates/UnixWare/SCOSA-2005.64/SCOSA-2005.64.txt http://secunia.com/advisories/15393 http://secunia.com/advisories/15417 http://secunia.com/advisories/18222 http://secunia.com/advisories/18662 http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2006-032.htm http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-sn-20050518-tcpts.shtml http:/& •