6 results (0.006 seconds)

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 79EXPL: 1

The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176280/Terrapin-SSH-Connection-Weakening.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Mar/21 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/18/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/19/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/17/8 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-48 • CWE-222: Truncation of Security-relevant Information CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0

In Erlang/OTP before 23.3.4.15, 24.x before 24.3.4.2, and 25.x before 25.0.2, there is a Client Authentication Bypass in certain client-certification situations for SSL, TLS, and DTLS. En Erlang/OTP versiones anteriores a 23.3.4.15, 24.x anteriores a 24.3.4.2 y 25.x anteriores a 25.0.2, se presenta una Omisión de Autenticación de Cliente en determinadas situaciones de certificación de cliente para SSL, TLS y DTLS A Client Authentication Bypass was found in Erlang/OTP. This issue occurs in certain client-certification situations for SSL, TLS, and DTLS. • https://erlangforums.com/c/erlang-news-announcements/91 https://erlangforums.com/t/otp-25-1-released/1854 https://github.com/erlang/otp/compare/OTP-23.3.4.14...OTP-23.3.4.15 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/07/msg00012.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-37026 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141802 • CWE-305: Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness •

CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 1

A local privilege escalation vulnerability was discovered in Erlang/OTP prior to version 23.2.3. By adding files to an existing installation's directory, a local attacker could hijack accounts of other users running Erlang programs or possibly coerce a service running with "erlsrv.exe" to execute arbitrary code as Local System. This can occur only under specific conditions on Windows with unsafe filesystem permissions. Se detectó una vulnerabilidad de escalada de privilegios local en Erlang/OTP anterior a versión 23.2.3. Al agregar archivos a un directorio de instalación existente, un atacante local podría secuestrar cuentas de otros usuarios que ejecutan programas Erlang o posiblemente coaccionar un servicio que se ejecuta con "erlsrv.exe" para ejecutar código arbitrario como Local System. • https://deepsurface.com/deepsurface-security-advisory-local-privilege-escalation-in-erlang-on-windows-cve-2021-29221 https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases/tag/OTP-23.2.3 • CWE-426: Untrusted Search Path •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0

An issue was discovered in Erlang/OTP before 23.2.2. The ssl application 10.2 accepts and trusts an invalid X.509 certificate chain to a trusted root Certification Authority. Se detectó un problema en Erlang/OTP versiones anteriores a 23.2.2. La aplicación ssl versión 10.2, acepta y confía en una cadena de certificados X.509 no válida para una Autoridad de Certificación root confiable • https://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2021-January/100357.html https://github.com/erlang/otp/releases https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/E4CXZWUOZELT7A5ZN6DJRQHX7L35V4PW https://www.erlang.org/downloads https://www.erlang.org/news • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

inets in Erlang possibly 22.1 and earlier follows RFC 3875 section 4.1.18 and therefore does not protect applications from the presence of untrusted client data in the HTTP_PROXY environment variable, which might allow remote attackers to redirect an application's outbound HTTP traffic to an arbitrary proxy server via a crafted Proxy header in an HTTP request, aka an "httpoxy" issue. inets en Erlang posiblemente versión 22.1 y anteriores, siguen RFC sección 3875 versión 4.1.18 y, por lo tanto, no protegen las aplicaciones de la presencia de datos de clientes no seguros en la variable de entorno HTTP_PROXY, lo que podría permitir a atacantes remotos redireccionar el tráfico HTTP saliente de una aplicación hacia un servidor proxy arbitrario por medio de un encabezado Proxy diseñado en una petición HTTP, también se conoce como un problema "httpoxy". • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/18/6 https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-198 https://httpoxy.org https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-1000107 • CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') •