CVE-2023-46748 – F5 BIG-IP Configuration Utility SQL Injection Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-46748
An authenticated SQL injection vulnerability exists in the BIG-IP Configuration utility which may allow an authenticated attacker with network access to the Configuration utility through the BIG-IP management port and/or self IP addresses to execute arbitrary system commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated Existe una vulnerabilidad de inyección SQL autenticada en la utilidad de configuración BIG-IP que puede permitir que un atacante autenticado con acceso de red a la utilidad de configuración a través del puerto de administración BIG-IP y/o direcciones IP propias ejecute comandos arbitrarios del sistema. Nota: Las versiones de software que han llegado al End of Technical Support (EoTS) no se evalúan F5 BIG-IP Configuration utility contains an SQL injection vulnerability that may allow an authenticated attacker with network access through the BIG-IP management port and/or self IP addresses to execute system commands. This vulnerability can be used in conjunction with CVE-2023-46747. • https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K000137365 https://www.secpod.com/blog/f5-issues-warning-big-ip-vulnerability-used-in-active-exploit-chain • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •
CVE-2023-46747 – F5 BIG-IP Configuration Utility Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-46747
Undisclosed requests may bypass configuration utility authentication, allowing an attacker with network access to the BIG-IP system through the management port and/or self IP addresses to execute arbitrary system commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated Las solicitudes no divulgadas pueden omitir la autenticación de la utilidad de configuración, lo que permite a un atacante con acceso de red al sistema BIG-IP a través del puerto de administración y/o direcciones IP propias ejecutar comandos arbitrarios del sistema. Nota: Las versiones de software que han llegado al End of Technical Support (EoTS) no se evalúan F5 BIG-IP Configuration utility contains an authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability due to undisclosed requests that may allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the BIG-IP system through the management port and/or self IP addresses to execute system commands. This vulnerability can be used in conjunction with CVE-2023-46748. • https://github.com/W01fh4cker/CVE-2023-46747-RCE https://github.com/RevoltSecurities/CVE-2023-46747 https://github.com/AliBrTab/CVE-2023-46747-POC https://github.com/maniak-academy/Mitigate-CVE-2023-46747 https://github.com/fu2x2000/CVE-2023-46747 https://github.com/y4v4z/CVE-2023-46747-POC https://github.com/bijaysenihang/CVE-2023-46747-Mass-RCE http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/175673/F5-BIG-IP-TMUI-AJP-Smuggling-Remote-Command-Execution.html https://my.f5.com/manage/s/art • CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function •
CVE-2023-44487 – HTTP/2 Rapid Reset Attack Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-44487
The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. El protocolo HTTP/2 permite una denegación de servicio (consumo de recursos del servidor) porque la cancelación de solicitudes puede restablecer muchas transmisiones rápidamente, como se explotó en la naturaleza entre agosto y octubre de 2023. A flaw was found in handling multiplexed streams in the HTTP/2 protocol. A client can repeatedly make a request for a new multiplex stream and immediately send an RST_STREAM frame to cancel it. This creates extra work for the server setting up and tearing down the streams while not hitting any server-side limit for the maximum number of active streams per connection, resulting in a denial of service due to server resource consumption. • https://github.com/imabee101/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/studiogangster/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/bcdannyboy/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/sigridou/CVE-2023-44487- https://github.com/ByteHackr/CVE-2023-44487 https://github.com/ReToCode/golang-CVE-2023-44487 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/13/9 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/18/4 http://www. • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVE-2019-11109
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11109
Logic issue in the subsystem for Intel(R) SPS before versions SPS_E5_04.01.04.275.0, SPS_SoC-X_04.00.04.100.0 and SPS_SoC-A_04.00.04.191.0 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. Un problema lógico en el subsistema para Intel® SPS versiones anteriores a SPS_E5_04.01.04.275.0, SPS_SoC-X_04.00.04.100.0 y SPS_SoC-A_04.00.04.191.0, puede permitir a un usuario privilegiado habilitar potencialmente una denegación de servicio por medio de un acceso local. • https://support.f5.com/csp/article/K54164678?utm_source=f5support&%3Butm_medium=RSS https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00241.html •
CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •