24 results (0.007 seconds)

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a los bucles de recursos, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante crea múltiples flujos de solicitud y baraja continuamente la prioridad de los flujos de una manera que provoca un cambio considerable en el árbol de prioridad. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 7%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0

Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a la manipulación del tamaño de la ventana y la manipulación de priorización de flujo, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00035.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00003.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00014.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2692 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •

CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

NetGain Enterprise Manager (EM) is affected by multiple Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in versions before 10.1.12. NetGain Enterprise Manager (EM) se ha visto afectado por múltiples vulnerabilidades Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) persistente en las versiones anteriores a la 10.1.12. • https://www.wizlynxgroup.com/security-research-advisories/vuln/WLX-2018-003 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

NetGain Enterprise Manager (EM) is affected by OS Command Injection vulnerabilities in versions before 10.0.57. These vulnerabilities could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary code, resulting in remote code execution. NetGain Enterprise Manager (EM) se ha visto afectado por vulnerabilidades de inyección de comandos en las versiones anteriores a la 10.0.57. Estas vulnerabilidades podrían permitir que los atacantes remotos autenticados inyecten código arbitrario, lo que resultaría en la ejecución remota de código. • https://www.wizlynxgroup.com/security-research-advisories/vuln/WLX-2018-004 • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 9%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0

This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable installations of Netgain Enterprise Manager. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within upload_save_do.jsp. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied path prior to using it in file operations. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code under the context of the current user. • https://www.tenable.com/security/research/tra-2018-02 https://zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-17-952 • CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') CWE-668: Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere •