5 results (0.006 seconds)

CVSS: 8.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0

Any project that parses untrusted Protocol Buffers data containing an arbitrary number of nested groups / series of SGROUP tags can corrupted by exceeding the stack limit i.e. StackOverflow. Parsing nested groups as unknown fields with DiscardUnknownFieldsParser or Java Protobuf Lite parser, or against Protobuf map fields, creates unbounded recursions that can be abused by an attacker. • https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/commit/cc8b3483a5584b3301e3d43d17eb59704857ffaa • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

A parsing issue similar to CVE-2022-3171, but with Message-Type Extensions in protobuf-java core and lite versions prior to 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 and 3.16.3 can lead to a denial of service attack. Inputs containing multiple instances of non-repeated embedded messages with repeated or unknown fields causes objects to be converted back-n-forth between mutable and immutable forms, resulting in potentially long garbage collection pauses. We recommend updating to the versions mentioned above. Un problema de análisis similar a CVE-2022-3171, pero con extensiones de tipo de mensaje en las versiones protobuf-java core y lite anteriores a 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 y 3.16.3 puede provocar un ataque de Denegación de Servicio (DoS). . Las entradas que contienen múltiples instancias de mensajes incrustados no repetidos con campos repetidos o desconocidos hacen que los objetos se conviertan de un lado a otro entre formas mutables e inmutables, lo que resulta en pausas de recolección de basura potencialmente largas. • https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/commit/db7c17803320525722f45c1d26fc08bc41d1bf48 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3510 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184176 • CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0

A parsing issue similar to CVE-2022-3171, but with textformat in protobuf-java core and lite versions prior to 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 and 3.16.3 can lead to a denial of service attack. Inputs containing multiple instances of non-repeated embedded messages with repeated or unknown fields causes objects to be converted back-n-forth between mutable and immutable forms, resulting in potentially long garbage collection pauses. We recommend updating to the versions mentioned above. Un problema de análisis similar a CVE-2022-3171, pero con formato de texto en las versiones core y lite de protobuf-java anteriores a 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 y 3.16.3 puede provocar un ataque de Denegación de Servicio (DoS). Las entradas que contienen múltiples instancias de mensajes incrustados no repetidos con campos repetidos o desconocidos hacen que los objetos se conviertan de un lado a otro entre formas mutables e inmutables, lo que resulta en pausas de recolección de basura potencialmente largas. • https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/commit/a3888f53317a8018e7a439bac4abeb8f3425d5e9 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3509 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184161 • CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 21EXPL: 0

A parsing issue with binary data in protobuf-java core and lite versions prior to 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 and 3.16.3 can lead to a denial of service attack. Inputs containing multiple instances of non-repeated embedded messages with repeated or unknown fields causes objects to be converted back-n-forth between mutable and immutable forms, resulting in potentially long garbage collection pauses. We recommend updating to the versions mentioned above. Un problema de análisis de datos binarios en protobuf-java core y lite versiones anteriores a 3.21.7, 3.20.3, 3.19.6 y 3.16.3, puede conllevar a un ataque de denegación de servicio. Las entradas que contienen múltiples instancias de mensajes insertados no repetidos con campos repetidos o desconocidos causan que los objetos sean convertidos de ida y vuelta entre las formas mutables e inmutables, resultando en pausas de recolección de basura potencialmente largas. • https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/security/advisories/GHSA-h4h5-3hr4-j3g2 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CBAUKJQL6O4TIWYBENORSY5P43TVB4M3 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MPCGUT3T5L6C3IDWUPSUO22QDCGQKTOP https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202301-09 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3171 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137645 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 1

An issue in protobuf-java allowed the interleaving of com.google.protobuf.UnknownFieldSet fields in such a way that would be processed out of order. A small malicious payload can occupy the parser for several minutes by creating large numbers of short-lived objects that cause frequent, repeated pauses. We recommend upgrading libraries beyond the vulnerable versions. Un problema en protobuf-java permitía intercalar campos com.google.protobuf.UnknownFieldSet de tal manera que eran procesados fuera de orden. Una pequeña carga útil maliciosa puede ocupar el analizador durante varios minutos al crear un gran número de objetos de corta duración que causan frecuentes y repetidas pausas. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/12/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/12/7 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=39330 https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2022-001 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00019.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-22569 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039903 • CWE-696: Incorrect Behavior Order •