CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2023-30903
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-30903
HP-UX could be exploited locally to create a Denial of Service (DoS) when any physical interface is configured with IPv6/inet6. • https://support.hpe.com/hpesc/public/docDisplay?docLocale=en_US&docId=hpesbux04474en_us •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 49EXPL: 2CVE-2016-2776 – ISC BIND 9 - Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2776
buffer.c in named in ISC BIND 9 before 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P3, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0rc3 does not properly construct responses, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and daemon exit) via a crafted query. buffer.c en named en ISC BIND 9 en versiones anteriores a 9.9.9-P3, 9.10.x en versiones anteriores a 9.10.4-P3 y 9.11.x en versiones anteriores a 9.11.0rc3 no construye respuestas adecuadamente, lo que permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (fallo de aserción y salida de demonio) a través de una consulta manipulada. A denial of service flaw was found in the way BIND constructed a response to a query that met certain criteria. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make named exit unexpectedly with an assertion failure via a specially crafted DNS request packet. A defect in the rendering of messages into packets can cause named to exit with an assertion failure in buffer.c while constructing a response to a query that meets certain criteria. This assertion can be triggered even if the apparent source address isnt allowed to make queries. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/40453 https://github.com/infobyte/CVE-2016-2776 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1944.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1945.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2099.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinoct2016-3090566.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinoct2016-3090545.html http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/ovmbulletinoct2016-3090547.html http://www.securityf • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-617: Reachable Assertion •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 90%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2016-2775 – bind: Too long query name causes segmentation fault in lwresd
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2016-2775
ISC BIND 9.x before 9.9.9-P2, 9.10.x before 9.10.4-P2, and 9.11.x before 9.11.0b2, when lwresd or the named lwres option is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a long request that uses the lightweight resolver protocol. ISC BIND 9.x en versiones anteriores a 9.9.9-P2, 9.10.x en versiones anteriores a 9.10.4-P2 y 9.11.x en versiones anteriores a 9.11.0b2, cuando lwresd o la opción nombrada lwres está habilitada, permite a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (caída del demonio) a través de una petición larga que utiliza el protocolo ligero de resolución. It was found that the lightweight resolver protocol implementation in BIND could enter an infinite recursion and crash when asked to resolve a query name which, when combined with a search list entry, exceeds the maximum allowable length. A remote attacker could use this flaw to crash lwresd or named when using the "lwres" statement in named.conf. • http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92037 http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036360 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:0651 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1767 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2533 https://h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05321107 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01393/74/CVE-2016-2775 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01435 https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01436 https://kb.isc.org&#x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2015-4000 – LOGJAM: TLS connections which support export grade DHE key-exchange are vulnerable to MITM attacks
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2015-4000
The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 240EXPL: 0CVE-2014-7810 – Tomcat/JbossWeb: security manager bypass via EL expressions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2014-7810
The Expression Language (EL) implementation in Apache Tomcat 6.x before 6.0.44, 7.x before 7.0.58, and 8.x before 8.0.16 does not properly consider the possibility of an accessible interface implemented by an inaccessible class, which allows attackers to bypass a SecurityManager protection mechanism via a web application that leverages use of incorrect privileges during EL evaluation. La implementación Expression Language (EL) en Apache Tomcat 6.x anterior a 6.0.44, 7.x anterior a 7.0.58, y 8.x anterior a 8.0.16 no considera correctamente la posibilidad de una interfaz accesible implementada por una clase no accesible, lo que permite a atacantes evadir un mecanismo de protección SecurityManager a través de una aplicación web que aprovecha el uso de privilegios incorrectos durante la evaluación EL. It was found that the expression language resolver evaluated expressions within a privileged code section. A malicious web application could use this flaw to bypass security manager protections. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145974991225029&w=2 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1621.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1622.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0492.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2046.html http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1644018 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1645642 http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html http://tomcat.apach • CWE-284: Improper Access Control •