CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 18%CPEs: 8EXPL: 0CVE-2002-1698
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-1698
31 Dec 2002 — Buffer overflow in Microsoft MSN Messenger Service 1.0 through 4.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long FN (font) argument in the message header. • http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/271130 •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 16%CPEs: 8EXPL: 2CVE-2002-1831 – Microsoft MSN Messenger 1 < 4 - Malformed Invite Request Denial of Service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-1831
31 Dec 2002 — Microsoft MSN Messenger Service 1.0 through 4.6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an invite request that contains hex-encoded spaces (%20) in the Invitation-Cookie field. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/21481 •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 19%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2002-0155
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-0155
29 May 2002 — Buffer overflow in Microsoft MSN Chat ActiveX Control, as used in MSN Messenger 4.5 and 4.6, and Exchange Instant Messenger 4.5 and 4.6, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long ResDLL parameter in the MSNChat OCX. Desbordamiento de búfer en el control ActiveX Microsoft MSN Chat, usado en MSN Messenger 4.5 y 4.6, y Exchange Instant Messenger 4.5 y 4.6, permite a atacantes remotos ejecutar código arbitrario mediante un parámetro ResDLL largo en el OCX MSNChat. • http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=102089960531919&w=2 •
CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 28%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2002-0228
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2002-0228
03 May 2002 — Microsoft MSN Messenger allows remote attackers to use Javascript that references an ActiveX object to obtain sensitive information such as display names and web site navigation, and possibly more when the user is connected to certain Microsoft sites (or DNS-spoofed sites). Microsoft MSN Messenger permite a atacantes remotos usar JavaScript que referencia a un objeto ActiveX para obtener información sensible como nombres mostrados y navegación de sitios web, y posiblemente mas cuando el usuario está conecta... • http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/254021 •