CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2023-1077
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-1077
In the Linux kernel, pick_next_rt_entity() may return a type confused entry, not detected by the BUG_ON condition, as the confused entry will not be NULL, but list_head.The buggy error condition would lead to a type confused entry with the list head,which would then be used as a type confused sched_rt_entity,causing memory corruption. • https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=7c4a5b89a0b5a57a64b601775b296abf77a9fe97 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/05/msg00005.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/01/msg00004.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230511-0002 • CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 144EXPL: 0CVE-2021-33060
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33060
Out-of-bounds write in the BIOS firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. Una escritura fuera de límites en el firmware de la BIOS para algunos procesadores Intel(R) puede permitir que un usuario autenticado permita potencialmente una escalada de privilegios por medio de acceso local. • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220930-0004 https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00686.html • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2022-36879 – kernel: xfrm_expand_policies() in net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c can cause a refcount to be dropped twice
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-36879
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.18.14. xfrm_expand_policies in net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c can cause a refcount to be dropped twice. Se ha detectado un problema en el kernel de Linux versiones hasta 5.18.14. la función xfrm_expand_policies en el archivo net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c puede causar que un refcount sea descartado dos veces A flaw was found in the Linux kernel’s IP framework for transforming packets (XFRM subsystem). An error while resolving policies in xfrm_bundle_lookup causes the refcount to drop twice, leading to a possible crash and a denial of service. • https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=f85daf0e725358be78dfd208dea5fd665d8cb901 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/f85daf0e725358be78dfd208dea5fd665d8cb901 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/09/msg00011.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00000.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220901-0007 https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5207 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-36879 https://bugzilla.r • CWE-911: Improper Update of Reference Count •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1473 – Resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1473
The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service. Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=64c85430f95200b6b51fe9475bd5203f7c19daf1 https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-02 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1473 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087913 • CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime CWE-459: Incomplete Cleanup •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2022-1343 – OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-1343
The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. • https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009 https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087911 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •