CVSS: 4.7EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 0CVE-2021-27003
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-27003
12 Oct 2021 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.5P18, 9.6P15, 9.7P14, 9.8P5 and 9.9.1 are missing an X-Frame-Options header which could allow a clickjacking attack. Clustered Data ONTAP versiones anteriores a 9.5P18, 9.6P15, 9.7P14, 9.8P5 y 9.9.1 carecen de un encabezado X-Frame-Options que podría permitir un ataque de clickjacking • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20211012-0001 • CWE-1021: Improper Restriction of Rendered UI Layers or Frames •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 5EXPL: 0CVE-2021-26994
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-26994
04 Jun 2021 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.7P13 and 9.8P3 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow single workloads to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) on a cluster node. Clustered Data ONTAP versiones anteriores a 9.7P13 y 9.8P3, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que podría permitir a cargas de trabajo individuales causar una Denegación de Servicio (DoS) en un nodo del clúster • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/NTAP-20210601-0001 •
CVSS: 3.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 33EXPL: 0CVE-2020-8590
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8590
08 Feb 2021 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.1P18 and 9.3P12 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles even when the –remove-private-data parameter is set to true. Clustered Data ONTAP versiones anteriores a 9.1P18 y 9.3P12, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que podría permitir a un atacante detectar nombres de nodo por medio de paquetes de AutoSupport inclusive cuando el parámetro –remove-private-data es establecido en verdadero • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/NTAP-20210208-0003 •
CVSS: 3.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2020-8578
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8578
08 Feb 2021 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an attacker to discover node names via AutoSupport bundles even when the –remove-private-data parameter is set to true. Clustered Data ONTAP versiones anteriores a 9.3P20, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que podría permitir a un atacante detectar nombres de nodo por medio de paquetes de AutoSupport inclusive cuando el parámetro –remove-private-data se establece en true • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/NTAP-20210208-0002 •
CVSS: 3.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2020-8589
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8589
03 Feb 2021 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the names of other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs) and filenames on those SVMs. Clustered Data ONTAP versiones anteriores a 9.3P20 y 9.5P15, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que podría permitir a usuarios arrendatarios no autorizados detectar los nombres de otras Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs) y los nombres de archivo en esas SVM • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210201-0002 •
CVSS: 3.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 0CVE-2020-8588
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8588
03 Feb 2021 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5P15 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow unauthorized tenant users to discover the existence of data on other Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs). Clustered Data ONTAP versiones anteriores a 9.3P20 y 9.5P15, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que podría permitir a usuarios arrendatarios no autorizados detectar la existencia de datos en otras Storage Virtual Machines (SVMs) • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210201-0001 •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 0CVE-2020-8581
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8581
19 Jan 2021 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P20 and 9.5 are susceptible to a vulnerability which could allow an authenticated but unauthorized attacker to overwrite arbitrary data when VMware vStorage support is enabled. Clustered Data ONTAP versiones anteriores a 9.3P20 y 9.5, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que podría permitir a un atacante autenticado pero no autorizado sobrescribir datos arbitrarios cuando la compatibilidad con VMware vStorage está habilitada • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210119-0001 •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 94EXPL: 0CVE-2020-8576
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8576
02 Sep 2020 — Clustered Data ONTAP versions prior to 9.3P19, 9.5P14, 9.6P9 and 9.7 are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to addition or modification of data or disclosure of sensitive information. Las versiones de Clustered Data ONTAP anteriores a 9.3P19, 9.5P14, 9.6P9 y 9.7, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que, cuando se explota con éxito, podría conllevar a una adición o modificación de datos o a una divulgación de información confidencial • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/NTAP-20200902-0001 •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 84%CPEs: 26EXPL: 4CVE-2019-10092 – Apache Httpd mod_proxy - Error Page Cross-Site Scripting
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10092
27 Aug 2019 — In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed. En Apache HTTP Server versiones 2.4.0 hasta 2.4.39, se reportó un problema de cross-site scripting limitado que afecta la ... • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/47688 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9517 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9517
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones HT... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00004.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •