CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 2CVE-2020-9391
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-9391
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel 5.4 and 5.5 through 5.5.6 on the AArch64 architecture. It ignores the top byte in the address passed to the brk system call, potentially moving the memory break downwards when the application expects it to move upwards, aka CID-dcde237319e6. This has been observed to cause heap corruption with the GNU C Library malloc implementation. Se detectó un problema en el kernel de Linux versión 5.4 y versiones 5.5 hasta 5.5.6 sobre la arquitectura AArch64. Ignora el byte superior en la dirección pasada a la llamada de sistema brk, posiblemente moviendo la memoria hacia abajo cuando la aplicación espera que se mueva hacia arriba, también se conoce como CID-dcde237319e6. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/02/25/6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1797052 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=dcde237319e626d1ec3c9d8b7613032f0fd4663a https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/O4LH35HOPBJIKYHYFXMBBM75DN75PZHZ https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20200313-0003 • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write •
CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 18EXPL: 0CVE-2020-9383 – kernel: out-of-bounds read in set_fdc in drivers/block/floppy.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-9383
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel 3.16 through 5.5.6. set_fdc in drivers/block/floppy.c leads to a wait_til_ready out-of-bounds read because the FDC index is not checked for errors before assigning it, aka CID-2e90ca68b0d2. Se detectó un problema en el kernel de Linux versión 3.16 hasta la versión 5.5.6. La función set_fdc en el archivo drivers/block/floppy.c, conlleva a una lectura fuera de límites de wait_til_ready porque el índice FDC no es comprobado para errores antes de asignarlos, también se conoce como CID-2e90ca68b0d2 An out-of-bounds (OOB) memory access flaw was found in the floppy driver module in the Linux kernel. A bounds check failure allows a local attacker to gain access to out-of-bounds memory leading to a system crash or a leak of internal kernel information. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00039.html https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?id=2f9ac30a54dc0181ddac3705cdcf4775d863c530 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/2e90ca68b0d2f5548804f22f0dd61145516171e3 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/06/msg00011.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/06/msg00012.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/06/msg00013.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap& • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 38EXPL: 18CVE-2020-1938 – Apache Tomcat Improper Privilege Management Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1938
When using the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP), care must be taken when trusting incoming connections to Apache Tomcat. Tomcat treats AJP connections as having higher trust than, for example, a similar HTTP connection. If such connections are available to an attacker, they can be exploited in ways that may be surprising. In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99, Tomcat shipped with an AJP Connector enabled by default that listened on all configured IP addresses. It was expected (and recommended in the security guide) that this Connector would be disabled if not required. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/49039 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48143 https://github.com/sgdream/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/xindongzhuaizhuai/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/laolisafe/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/sv3nbeast/CVE-2020-1938-Tomact-file_include-file_read https://github.com/fairyming/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/dacade/CVE-2020-1938 https://github.com/Hancheng-Lei/Hacking-Vulnerability-CVE-2020-1938-Ghostcat https://github.com/w4fz5uck5& • CWE-285: Improper Authorization •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 60EXPL: 0CVE-2020-1935 – tomcat: Mishandling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1935
In Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.30, 8.5.0 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.99 the HTTP header parsing code used an approach to end-of-line parsing that allowed some invalid HTTP headers to be parsed as valid. This led to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. En Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.0 hasta 7.0.99, el código de análisis del encabezado HTTP utilizó un enfoque para el análisis de fin de línea que permitió a algunos encabezados HTTP no válidos ser analizados como válidos. Esto conllevó a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido en una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r127f76181aceffea2bd4711b03c595d0f115f63e020348fe925a916c%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r441c1f30a252bf14b07396286f6abd8089ce4240e91323211f1a2d75%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r660cd379afe346f10d72c0eaa8459ccc95d83aff181671b7e9076919%40%3Cusers.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17569 – tomcat: Regression in handling of Transfer-Encoding header allows for HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17569
The refactoring present in Apache Tomcat 9.0.28 to 9.0.30, 8.5.48 to 8.5.50 and 7.0.98 to 7.0.99 introduced a regression. The result of the regression was that invalid Transfer-Encoding headers were incorrectly processed leading to a possibility of HTTP Request Smuggling if Tomcat was located behind a reverse proxy that incorrectly handled the invalid Transfer-Encoding header in a particular manner. Such a reverse proxy is considered unlikely. La refactorización presente en Apache Tomcat versiones 9.0.28 hasta 9.0.30, versiones 8.5.48 hasta 8.5.50 y versiones 7.0.98 hasta 7.0.99, introdujo una regresión. El resultado de la regresión fue que los encabezados Transfer-Encoding no válidos fueron procesados incorrectamente, conllevando a una posibilidad de Tráfico No Autorizado de Peticiones HTTP si Tomcat se encontraba detrás de un proxy inverso que manejaba incorrectamente el encabezado Transfer-Encoding no válido de una manera particular. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-03/msg00025.html https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r7bc994c965a34876bd94d5ff15b4e1e30b6220a15eb9b47c81915b78%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r88def002c5c78534674ca67472e035099fbe088813d50062094a1390%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc31cbabb46cdc58bbdd8519a8f64b6236b2635a3922bbeba0f0e3743%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/03/msg00006.html https://security.netapp.com/advisory&# • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •