CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 2EXPL: 0CVE-2019-5507
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-5507
SnapManager for Oracle prior to version 3.4.2P1 are susceptible to a vulnerability which when successfully exploited could lead to disclosure of sensitive information. SnapManager para Oracle anterior a la versión 3.4.2P1, son susceptibles a una vulnerabilidad que cuando es explotada con éxito podría conllevar a la divulgación de información confidencial. • https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20191009-0004 •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 57EXPL: 1CVE-2019-7317 – libpng: use-after-free in png_image_free in png.c
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-7317
png_image_free in png.c in libpng 1.6.x before 1.6.37 has a use-after-free because png_image_free_function is called under png_safe_execute. La función png_image_free en el archivo png.c en libpng versiones 1.6.x anteriores a 1.6.37, presenta un uso de la memoria previamente liberada porque la función png_image_free_function es llamada bajo png_safe_execute. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00002.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00029.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00084.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00038.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00044.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152561/Slackware-Security-Advisory-libpng-Updates.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/108098 https:/ • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-416: Use After Free •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 27EXPL: 0CVE-2017-7657 – jetty: HTTP request smuggling
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2017-7657
In Eclipse Jetty, versions 9.2.x and older, 9.3.x (all configurations), and 9.4.x (non-default configuration with RFC2616 compliance enabled), transfer-encoding chunks are handled poorly. The chunk length parsing was vulnerable to an integer overflow. Thus a large chunk size could be interpreted as a smaller chunk size and content sent as chunk body could be interpreted as a pipelined request. If Jetty was deployed behind an intermediary that imposed some authorization and that intermediary allowed arbitrarily large chunks to be passed on unchanged, then this flaw could be used to bypass the authorization imposed by the intermediary as the fake pipelined request would not be interpreted by the intermediary as a request. En Eclipse Jetty, en versiones 9.2.x y anteriores, versiones 9.3.x (todas las configuraciones) y versiones 9.4.x (configuración personalizada con el cumplimiento RFC2616 habilitado), los fragmentos transfer-encoding se gestionan de forma incorrecta. • http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1041194 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0910 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=535668 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/053d9ce4d579b02203db18545fee5e33f35f2932885459b74d1e4272%40%3Cissues.activemq.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/708d94141126eac03011144a971a6411fcac16d9c248d1d535a39451%40%3Csolr-user.lucene.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9317fd092b257a0815434b116a8af8daea6e920b6673f4fd5583d5fe%40%3Ccommits.druid.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache. • CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •