CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 1EXPL: 0CVE-2024-3566 – Command injection vulnerability in programing languages on Microsoft Windows operating system.
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-3566
10 Apr 2024 — A command inject vulnerability allows an attacker to perform command injection on Windows applications that indirectly depend on the CreateProcess function when the specific conditions are satisfied. • https://flatt.tech/research/posts/batbadbut-you-cant-securely-execute-commands-on-windows •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 17EXPL: 1CVE-2021-44533 – nodejs: Incorrect handling of certificate subject and issuer fields
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44533
24 Feb 2022 — Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 did not handle multi-value Relative Distinguished Names correctly. Attackers could craft certificate subjects containing a single-value Relative Distinguished Name that would be interpreted as a multi-value Relative Distinguished Name, for example, in order to inject a Common Name that would allow bypassing the certificate subject verification.Affected versions of Node.js that do not accept multi-value Relative Distinguished Names and are thus not vulner... • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 16EXPL: 1CVE-2021-44532 – nodejs: Certificate Verification Bypass via String Injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44532
24 Feb 2022 — Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 converts SANs (Subject Alternative Names) to a string format. It uses this string to check peer certificates against hostnames when validating connections. The string format was subject to an injection vulnerability when name constraints were used within a certificate chain, allowing the bypass of these name constraints.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this escape SANs containing the problematic characters in order to prevent the injection. This beha... • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation CWE-296: Improper Following of a Certificate's Chain of Trust •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 0CVE-2021-44531 – nodejs: Improper handling of URI Subject Alternative Names
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-44531
24 Feb 2022 — Accepting arbitrary Subject Alternative Name (SAN) types, unless a PKI is specifically defined to use a particular SAN type, can result in bypassing name-constrained intermediates. Node.js < 12.22.9, < 14.18.3, < 16.13.2, and < 17.3.1 was accepting URI SAN types, which PKIs are often not defined to use. Additionally, when a protocol allows URI SANs, Node.js did not match the URI correctly.Versions of Node.js with the fix for this disable the URI SAN type when checking a certificate against a hostname. This ... • https://hackerone.com/reports/1429694 • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •
CVSS: 9.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 21EXPL: 1CVE-2020-8174 – nodejs: memory corruption in napi_get_value_string_* functions
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-8174
28 Jun 2020 — napi_get_value_string_*() allows various kinds of memory corruption in node < 10.21.0, 12.18.0, and < 14.4.0. La función napi_get_value_string_*(), permite varios tipos de corrupción de memoria en node versiones anteriores a 10.21.0, 12.18.0 y versiones anteriores a 14.4.0 A flaw was found in nodejs. Calling napi_get_value_string_latin1(), napi_get_value_string_utf8(), or napi_get_value_string_utf16() with a non-NULL buf, and a bufsize of 0 will cause the entire string value to be written to buf, probably o... • https://hackerone.com/reports/784186 • CWE-119: Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer CWE-191: Integer Underflow (Wrap or Wraparound) •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 3%CPEs: 35EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9518 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9518
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 4%CPEs: 43EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9517 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9517
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. Algunas implementaciones HT... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00004.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 2%CPEs: 44EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9515 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9515
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a una inundación de configuraciones, lo... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00031.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 27%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0CVE-2019-9512 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9512
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a las inundaciones de ping, lo que puede conducir a una denegación de servicio. El atacante envía pings continuos a un par HTTP / 2, haciendo que el... • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00076.html • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption •
CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 15%CPEs: 39EXPL: 1CVE-2019-9511 – Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-9511
13 Aug 2019 — Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. Algunas implementaciones de HTTP / 2 son vulnerables a la manip... • https://github.com/flyniu666/ingress-nginx-0.21-1.19.5 • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •