34 results (0.028 seconds)

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Type confusion in JavaScript in Google Chrome prior to 79.0.3945.79 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. Una confusión de tipo en JavaScript en Google Chrome versiones anteriores a la versión 79.0.3945.79, permitió a un atacante remoto explotar potencialmente una corrupción de la pila por medio de una página HTML especialmente diseñada. • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00032.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-12/msg00036.html https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4238 https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2019/12/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html https://crbug.com/1028862 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2Z5M4FPUMDNX2LDPHJKN5ZV5GIS2AKNU https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/m • CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write CWE-843: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 19%CPEs: 51EXPL: 0

The certificate parser in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via crafted certificate operations, related to s3_clnt.c and s3_srvr.c. El analizador certificado en OpenSSL en versiones anteriores a 1.0.1u y 1.0.2 en versiones anteriores a 1.0.2i podría permitir a atacantes remotos provocar una denegación de servicio (lectura fuera de rango) a través de operaciones certificadas manipuladas, relacionado con s3_clnt.c y s3_srvr.c. Multiple out of bounds read flaws were found in the way OpenSSL handled certain TLS/SSL protocol handshake messages. A remote attacker could possibly use these flaws to crash a TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00022.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00023.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00024.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-09/msg00031.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00005.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-10/msg00011.h • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 97%CPEs: 147EXPL: 1

The SSL protocol 3.0, as used in OpenSSL through 1.0.1i and other products, uses nondeterministic CBC padding, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain cleartext data via a padding-oracle attack, aka the "POODLE" issue. El protocolo SSL 3.0, utilizado en OpenSSL hasta 1.0.1i y otros productos, utiliza relleno (padding) CBC no determinístico, lo que facilita a los atacantes man-in-the-middle obtener datos de texto plano a través de un ataque de relleno (padding) oracle, también conocido como el problema "POODLE". A flaw was found in the way SSL 3.0 handled padding bytes when decrypting messages encrypted using block ciphers in cipher block chaining (CBC) mode. This flaw allows a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacker to decrypt a selected byte of a cipher text in as few as 256 tries if they are able to force a victim application to repeatedly send the same data over newly created SSL 3.0 connections. • https://github.com/mikesplain/CVE-2014-3566-poodle-cookbook ftp://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2014-015.txt.asc http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0416.html http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/openssl_advisory11.asc http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0101.html http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-10/0103.html http://askubuntu.com/questions/537196/how-do-i-patch-workaround-sslv3-poodle-vulnerability-cve-2014-3566 http& • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-757: Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation ('Algorithm Downgrade') •

CVSS: 4.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 8EXPL: 1

The sock_setsockopt function in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel before 3.5.7 does not ensure that a keepalive action is associated with a stream socket, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (system crash) by leveraging the ability to create a raw socket. La función sock_setsockopt en net/core/sock.c en el kernel de Linux anterior a 3.5.7 no asegura que una acción keepalive está asociada con un socket de flujo, lo que permite a usuarios locales causar una denegación de servicio (caída del sistema) mediante el aprovechamiento de la habilidad de crear un socket en bruto. It was found that the Linux kernel's networking implementation did not correctly handle the setting of the keepalive socket option on raw sockets. A local user able to create a raw socket could use this flaw to crash the system. • http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=3e10986d1d698140747fcfc2761ec9cb64c1d582 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00020.html http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142722450701342&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=142722544401658&w=2 http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.5.7 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2014/09&#x • CWE-264: Permissions, Privileges, and Access Controls •

CVSS: 7.8EPSS: 1%CPEs: 18EXPL: 1

The rose_parse_ccitt function in net/rose/rose_subr.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.39 does not validate the FAC_CCITT_DEST_NSAP and FAC_CCITT_SRC_NSAP fields, which allows remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (integer underflow, heap memory corruption, and panic) via a small length value in data sent to a ROSE socket, or (2) conduct stack-based buffer overflow attacks via a large length value in data sent to a ROSE socket. La función rose_parse_ccitt en la net/rose/rose_subr.c en el kernel de Linux en versiones anteriores a la v2.6.39 no valida los campos FAC_CCITT_DEST_NSAP y FAC_CCITT_SRC_NSAP, lo que permite a atacantes remotos (1) provocar una denegación de servicio (desbordamiento de enteros, corrupción de memoria dinámica, y 'panic' del kernel) a través de un valor de longitud pequeña en los datos enviados a un 'socket' ROSE, o (2) llevar a cabo ataques de desbordamiento de pila basados ??en buffer a través de un valor de longitud demasiado grande en los datos enviados a un 'socket' ROSE. • http://ftp.osuosl.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.39 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=be20250c13f88375345ad99950190685eda51eb8 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-04/msg00020.html http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/12/28/2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770777 https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/be20250c13f88375345ad99950190685eda51eb8 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation •