CVSS: 8.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 54EXPL: 44CVE-2024-6387 – Openssh: regresshion - race condition in ssh allows rce/dos
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2024-6387
A security regression (CVE-2006-5051) was discovered in OpenSSH's server (sshd). There is a race condition which can lead sshd to handle some signals in an unsafe manner. An unauthenticated, remote attacker may be able to trigger it by failing to authenticate within a set time period. Se encontró una condición de ejecución del controlador de señales en el servidor de OpenSSH (sshd), donde un cliente no se autentica dentro de los segundos de LoginGraceTime (120 de forma predeterminada, 600 en versiones anteriores de OpenSSH), luego se llama al controlador SIGALRM de sshd de forma asincrónica. Sin embargo, este controlador de señales llama a varias funciones que no son seguras para señales asíncronas, por ejemplo, syslog(). • https://github.com/l0n3m4n/CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/thegenetic/CVE-2024-6387-exploit https://github.com/d0rb/CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/devarshishimpi/CVE-2024-6387-Check https://github.com/AiGptCode/ssh_exploiter_CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/Symbolexe/CVE-2024-6387 https://github.com/xonoxitron/regreSSHion https://github.com/PrincipalAnthony/CVE-2024-6387-Updated-x64bit https://github.com/4lxprime/regreSSHive https://github.com/shamo0/CVE-2024-6387_PoC https:&# • CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition') CWE-364: Signal Handler Race Condition •
CVSS: 7.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 0CVE-2023-51767
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-51767
OpenSSH through 9.6, when common types of DRAM are used, might allow row hammer attacks (for authentication bypass) because the integer value of authenticated in mm_answer_authpassword does not resist flips of a single bit. NOTE: this is applicable to a certain threat model of attacker-victim co-location in which the attacker has user privileges. OpenSSH hasta 9.6, cuando se utilizan tipos comunes de DRAM, podría permitir row hammer attacks (para omitir la autenticación) porque el valor entero de autenticado en mm_answer_authpassword no resiste cambios de un solo bit. NOTA: esto es aplicable a un determinado modelo de amenaza de ubicación conjunta entre atacante y víctima en el que el atacante tiene privilegios de usuario. • https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-51767 https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.02545 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2255850 https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/8241b9c0529228b4b86d88b1a6076fb9f97e4a99/auth-passwd.c#L77 https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/8241b9c0529228b4b86d88b1a6076fb9f97e4a99/monitor.c#L878 https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240125-0006 https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-51767 •
CVSS: 5.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 3EXPL: 0CVE-2023-51384
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-51384
In ssh-agent in OpenSSH before 9.6, certain destination constraints can be incompletely applied. When destination constraints are specified during addition of PKCS#11-hosted private keys, these constraints are only applied to the first key, even if a PKCS#11 token returns multiple keys. En ssh-agent en OpenSSH anterior a 9.6, ciertas restricciones de destino se pueden aplicar de forma incompleta. Cuando se especifican restricciones de destino durante la adición de claves privadas alojadas en PKCS#11, estas restricciones solo se aplican a la primera clave, incluso si un token PKCS#11 devuelve varias claves. • http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Mar/21 https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/881d9c6af9da4257c69c327c4e2f1508b2fa754b https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240105-0005 https://support.apple.com/kb/HT214084 https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5586 https://www.openssh.com/txt/release-9.6 https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/18/2 •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 79EXPL: 1CVE-2023-48795 – ssh: Prefix truncation attack on Binary Packet Protocol (BPP)
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-48795
The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6 and other products, allows remote attackers to bypass integrity checks such that some packets are omitted (from the extension negotiation message), and a client and server may consequently end up with a connection for which some security features have been downgraded or disabled, aka a Terrapin attack. This occurs because the SSH Binary Packet Protocol (BPP), implemented by these extensions, mishandles the handshake phase and mishandles use of sequence numbers. For example, there is an effective attack against SSH's use of ChaCha20-Poly1305 (and CBC with Encrypt-then-MAC). The bypass occurs in chacha20-poly1305@openssh.com and (if CBC is used) the -etm@openssh.com MAC algorithms. This also affects Maverick Synergy Java SSH API before 3.1.0-SNAPSHOT, Dropbear through 2022.83, Ssh before 5.1.1 in Erlang/OTP, PuTTY before 0.80, AsyncSSH before 2.14.2, golang.org/x/crypto before 0.17.0, libssh before 0.10.6, libssh2 through 1.11.0, Thorn Tech SFTP Gateway before 3.4.6, Tera Term before 5.1, Paramiko before 3.4.0, jsch before 0.2.15, SFTPGo before 2.5.6, Netgate pfSense Plus through 23.09.1, Netgate pfSense CE through 2.7.2, HPN-SSH through 18.2.0, ProFTPD before 1.3.8b (and before 1.3.9rc2), ORYX CycloneSSH before 2.3.4, NetSarang XShell 7 before Build 0144, CrushFTP before 10.6.0, ConnectBot SSH library before 2.2.22, Apache MINA sshd through 2.11.0, sshj through 0.37.0, TinySSH through 20230101, trilead-ssh2 6401, LANCOM LCOS and LANconfig, FileZilla before 3.66.4, Nova before 11.8, PKIX-SSH before 14.4, SecureCRT before 9.4.3, Transmit5 before 5.10.4, Win32-OpenSSH before 9.5.0.0p1-Beta, WinSCP before 6.2.2, Bitvise SSH Server before 9.32, Bitvise SSH Client before 9.33, KiTTY through 0.76.1.13, the net-ssh gem 7.2.0 for Ruby, the mscdex ssh2 module before 1.15.0 for Node.js, the thrussh library before 0.35.1 for Rust, and the Russh crate before 0.40.2 for Rust. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/176280/Terrapin-SSH-Connection-Weakening.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2024/Mar/21 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/18/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/19/5 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/12/20/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/03/06/3 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/04/17/8 https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2023-48 • CWE-222: Truncation of Security-relevant Information CWE-354: Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 4EXPL: 12CVE-2023-51385 – openssh: potential command injection via shell metacharacters
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2023-51385
In ssh in OpenSSH before 9.6, OS command injection might occur if a user name or host name has shell metacharacters, and this name is referenced by an expansion token in certain situations. For example, an untrusted Git repository can have a submodule with shell metacharacters in a user name or host name. En ssh en OpenSSH anterior a 9.6, la inyección de comandos del sistema operativo puede ocurrir si un nombre de usuario o nombre de host tiene metacaracteres de shell, y un token de expansión hace referencia a este nombre en ciertas situaciones. Por ejemplo, un repositorio Git que no es de confianza puede tener un submódulo con metacaracteres de shell en un nombre de usuario o nombre de host. A flaw was found in OpenSSH. • https://github.com/WOOOOONG/CVE-2023-51385 https://github.com/MiningBot-eth/CVE-2023-51385-exploit https://github.com/julienbrs/exploit-CVE-2023-51385 https://github.com/julienbrs/malicious-exploit-CVE-2023-51385 https://github.com/Le1a/CVE-2023-51385 https://github.com/thinkliving2020/CVE-2023-51385- https://github.com/farliy-hacker/CVE-2023-51385 https://github.com/farliy-hacker/CVE-2023-51385-save https://github.com/2048JiaLi/CVE-2023-51385 https://github.com/Sonicrrrr/ • CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') •