CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 75EXPL: 1CVE-2020-1971 – EDIPARTYNAME NULL pointer dereference
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-1971
The X.509 GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName. OpenSSL provides a function GENERAL_NAME_cmp which compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not. This function behaves incorrectly when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer dereference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack. • https://github.com/MBHudson/CVE-2020-1971 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/09/14/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2154ab83e14ede338d2ede9bbe5cdfce5d5a6c9e https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920 https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44676 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r63c6f2dd363d9b514d0a4bcf624580616a679898cc14c109a49b7 • CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 25EXPL: 0CVE-2019-17566 – batik: SSRF via "xlink:href"
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-17566
Apache Batik is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the "xlink:href" attributes. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. Apache Batik es vulnerable a un ataque de tipo server-side request forgery, causada por una comprobación inapropiada de la entrada por parte de los atributos "xlink:href". Al utilizar un argumento especialmente diseñado, un atacante podría explotar esta vulnerabilidad para causar que el servidor subyacente realice peticiones GET arbitrarias A flaw was found in the Apache Batik library, where it is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery attack (SSRF) via "xlink:href" attributes. This flaw allows an attacker to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rab94fe68b180d2e2fba97abf6fe1ec83cff826be25f86cd90f047171%40%3Ccommits.myfaces.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcab14a9ec91aa4c151e0729966282920423eff50a22759fd21db6509%40%3Ccommits.myfaces.apache.org%3E https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202401-11 https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2021.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html https://www&# • CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 71EXPL: 0CVE-2020-11979 – ant: insecure temporary file
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2020-11979
As mitigation for CVE-2020-1945 Apache Ant 1.10.8 changed the permissions of temporary files it created so that only the current user was allowed to access them. Unfortunately the fixcrlf task deleted the temporary file and created a new one without said protection, effectively nullifying the effort. This would still allow an attacker to inject modified source files into the build process. Como mitigación para CVE-2020-1945, Apache Ant versión 1.10.8, cambió los permisos de los archivos temporales que creó para que solo el usuario actual pudiera acceder a ellos. Desafortunadamente, la tarea fixcrlf eliminó el archivo temporal y creó uno nuevo sin dicha protección, anulando efectivamente el esfuerzo. • https://github.com/gradle/gradle/security/advisories/GHSA-j45w-qrgf-25vm https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r107ea1b1a7a214bc72fe1a04207546ccef542146ae22952e1013b5cc%40%3Cdev.creadur.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1dc8518dc99c42ecca5ff82d0d2de64cd5d3a4fa691eb9ee0304781e%40%3Cdev.creadur.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2306b67f20c24942b872b0a41fbdc9330e8467388158bcd19c1094e0%40%3Cdev.creadur.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4ca33fad3fb39d130cda287d5a60727d9e706e6f2cf2339b95729490%40%3Cdev.creadur.apache.org%3E https • CWE-377: Insecure Temporary File CWE-379: Creation of Temporary File in Directory with Insecure Permissions •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 1%CPEs: 180EXPL: 0CVE-2019-1559 – 0-byte record padding oracle
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-1559
If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt data. In order for this to be exploitable "non-stitched" ciphersuites must be in use. Stitched ciphersuites are optimised implementations of certain commonly used ciphersuites. Also the application must call SSL_shutdown() twice even if a protocol error has occurred (applications should not do this but some do anyway). • http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-03/msg00041.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00019.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-05/msg00049.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-06/msg00080.html http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/107174 https://access. • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-325: Missing Cryptographic Step •
CVSS: 4.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 41EXPL: 2CVE-2018-5407 – Intel (Skylake / Kaby Lake) - 'PortSmash' CPU SMT Side-Channel
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2018-5407
Simultaneous Multi-threading (SMT) in processors can enable local users to exploit software vulnerable to timing attacks via a side-channel timing attack on 'port contention'. SMT (Simultaneous Multi-threading) en los procesadores puede habilitar que usuarios locales exploten software vulnerable a ataques de sincronización mediante un ataques de sincronización de canal lateral en la "contención de puertos". A microprocessor side-channel vulnerability was found on SMT (e.g, Hyper-Threading) architectures. An attacker running a malicious process on the same core of the processor as the victim process can extract certain secret information. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45785 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/105897 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0483 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0651 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0652 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:2125 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3929 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3931 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3932 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3933 https& • CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy •