CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 97EXPL: 25CVE-2022-22965 – Spring Framework JDK 9+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22965
A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. Una aplicación Spring MVC o Spring WebFlux que es ejecutada en JDK 9+ puede ser vulnerable a la ejecución de código remota (RCE) por medio de una vinculación de datos. • https://github.com/0zvxr/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/alt3kx/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/zangcc/CVE-2022-22965-rexbb https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22965-PoC https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/CVE-2022-22965-Spring-Core-Rce https://github.com/p1ckzi/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/light-Life/CVE-2022-22965-GUItools https://github.com/viniciuspereiras/CVE-2022-22965-poc https://github.com/itsecurityco/CVE-2022-2 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 47EXPL: 23CVE-2022-22963 – VMware Tanzu Spring Cloud Function Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22963
In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. En Spring Cloud Function versiones 3.1.6, 3.2.2 y versiones anteriores no soportadas, cuando es usada la funcionalidad routing es posible que un usuario proporcione un SpEL especialmente diseñado como expresión de enrutamiento que puede resultar en la ejecución de código remota y el acceso a recursos locales A flaw was found in Spring Cloud Function via the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header that is modified by the attacker to contain malicious expression language code. The attacker is able to call functions that should not normally be accessible, including runtime exec calls. Spring Cloud Function versions prior to 3.1.7 and 3.2.3 are vulnerable to remote code execution due to using an unsafe evaluation context with user-provided queries. By crafting a request to the application and setting the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header, an unauthenticated attacker can gain remote code execution. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51577 https://github.com/dinosn/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/darryk10/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/RanDengShiFu/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https://github.com/charis3306/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/HenriV-V/Exploit-for-CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/iliass-dahman/CVE-2022-22963-POC https://github.com/lemmyz4n3771/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 213EXPL: 7CVE-2021-45105 – Apache Log4j2 does not always protect from infinite recursion in lookup evaluation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-45105
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. Apache Log4j2 versiones 2.0-alpha1 hasta 2.16.0 (excluyendo las versiones 2.12.3 y 2.3.1) no protegían de la recursión no controlada de las búsquedas autorreferenciales. Esto permite a un atacante con control sobre los datos de Thread Context Map causar una denegación de servicio cuando es interpretada una cadena diseñada. • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-1 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-dileepdkumar-https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-v htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •
CVSS: 7.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 7EXPL: 2CVE-2021-2471 – mysql-connector-java: unauthorized access to critical
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-2471
Vulnerability in the MySQL Connectors product of Oracle MySQL (component: Connector/J). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.26 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise MySQL Connectors. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all MySQL Connectors accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a hang or frequently repeatable crash (complete DOS) of MySQL Connectors. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality and Availability impacts). • https://github.com/cckuailong/CVE-2021-2471 https://github.com/DrunkenShells/CVE-2021-2471 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-2471 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2020583 • CWE-863: Incorrect Authorization •
CVSS: 7.4EPSS: 0%CPEs: 56EXPL: 0CVE-2021-3712 – Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3712
ASN.1 strings are represented internally within OpenSSL as an ASN1_STRING structure which contains a buffer holding the string data and a field holding the buffer length. This contrasts with normal C strings which are repesented as a buffer for the string data which is terminated with a NUL (0) byte. Although not a strict requirement, ASN.1 strings that are parsed using OpenSSL's own "d2i" functions (and other similar parsing functions) as well as any string whose value has been set with the ASN1_STRING_set() function will additionally NUL terminate the byte array in the ASN1_STRING structure. However, it is possible for applications to directly construct valid ASN1_STRING structures which do not NUL terminate the byte array by directly setting the "data" and "length" fields in the ASN1_STRING array. This can also happen by using the ASN1_STRING_set0() function. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/08/26/2 https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-244969.pdf https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=94d23fcff9b2a7a8368dfe52214d5c2569882c11 https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=ccb0a11145ee72b042d10593a64eaf9e8a55ec12 https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r18995de860f0e63635f3008f • CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read •