CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 97EXPL: 25CVE-2022-22965 – Spring Framework JDK 9+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22965
A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. Una aplicación Spring MVC o Spring WebFlux que es ejecutada en JDK 9+ puede ser vulnerable a la ejecución de código remota (RCE) por medio de una vinculación de datos. • https://github.com/0zvxr/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/alt3kx/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/zangcc/CVE-2022-22965-rexbb https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22965-PoC https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/CVE-2022-22965-Spring-Core-Rce https://github.com/p1ckzi/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/light-Life/CVE-2022-22965-GUItools https://github.com/viniciuspereiras/CVE-2022-22965-poc https://github.com/itsecurityco/CVE-2022-2 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 47EXPL: 23CVE-2022-22963 – VMware Tanzu Spring Cloud Function Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22963
In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. En Spring Cloud Function versiones 3.1.6, 3.2.2 y versiones anteriores no soportadas, cuando es usada la funcionalidad routing es posible que un usuario proporcione un SpEL especialmente diseñado como expresión de enrutamiento que puede resultar en la ejecución de código remota y el acceso a recursos locales A flaw was found in Spring Cloud Function via the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header that is modified by the attacker to contain malicious expression language code. The attacker is able to call functions that should not normally be accessible, including runtime exec calls. Spring Cloud Function versions prior to 3.1.7 and 3.2.3 are vulnerable to remote code execution due to using an unsafe evaluation context with user-provided queries. By crafting a request to the application and setting the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header, an unauthenticated attacker can gain remote code execution. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51577 https://github.com/dinosn/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/darryk10/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/RanDengShiFu/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https://github.com/charis3306/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/HenriV-V/Exploit-for-CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/iliass-dahman/CVE-2022-22963-POC https://github.com/lemmyz4n3771/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 213EXPL: 7CVE-2021-45105 – Apache Log4j2 does not always protect from infinite recursion in lookup evaluation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-45105
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. Apache Log4j2 versiones 2.0-alpha1 hasta 2.16.0 (excluyendo las versiones 2.12.3 y 2.3.1) no protegían de la recursión no controlada de las búsquedas autorreferenciales. Esto permite a un atacante con control sobre los datos de Thread Context Map causar una denegación de servicio cuando es interpretada una cadena diseñada. • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-1 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-dileepdkumar-https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-v htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 13EXPL: 1CVE-2021-33560 – libgcrypt: mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33560
Libgcrypt before 1.8.8 and 1.9.x before 1.9.3 mishandles ElGamal encryption because it lacks exponent blinding to address a side-channel attack against mpi_powm, and the window size is not chosen appropriately. This, for example, affects use of ElGamal in OpenPGP. Libgcrypt versiones anteriores a 1.8.8 y versiones 1.9.x anteriores a 1.9.3, maneja inapropiadamente el cifrado de ElGamal porque carece de cegado de exponentes para hacer frente a un ataque de canal lateral contra la función mpi_powm, y el tamaño de la ventana no se elige apropiadamente. Esto, por ejemplo, afecta el uso de ElGamal en OpenPGP. A side-channel attack flaw was found in the way libgcrypt implemented Elgamal encryption. • https://github.com/IBM/PGP-client-checker-CVE-2021-33560 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5305 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5328 https://dev.gnupg.org/T5466 https://dev.gnupg.org/rCe8b7f10be275bcedb5fc05ed4837a89bfd605c61 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00021.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BKKTOIGFW2SGN3DO2UHHVZ7MJSYN4AAB https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R7OAPCUGPF3VLA7QAJUQSL255D4ITVTL • CWE-203: Observable Discrepancy CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •
CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 0%CPEs: 6EXPL: 1CVE-2021-3448 – dnsmasq: fixed outgoing port used when --server is used with an interface name
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-3448
A flaw was found in dnsmasq in versions before 2.85. When configured to use a specific server for a given network interface, dnsmasq uses a fixed port while forwarding queries. An attacker on the network, able to find the outgoing port used by dnsmasq, only needs to guess the random transmission ID to forge a reply and get it accepted by dnsmasq. This flaw makes a DNS Cache Poisoning attack much easier. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. • https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1939368 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CVTJUOFFFHINLKWAOC2ZSC5MOPD4SJ24 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FHG7GWSQWKF7JXIMLOGJBKZWBB4VIAJ7 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GHURNEHHUBSW45KMIZ4FNBCSUPWPGV5V https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202105-20 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html https://access • CWE-358: Improperly Implemented Security Check for Standard •