CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 97EXPL: 25CVE-2022-22965 – Spring Framework JDK 9+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22965
A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. Una aplicación Spring MVC o Spring WebFlux que es ejecutada en JDK 9+ puede ser vulnerable a la ejecución de código remota (RCE) por medio de una vinculación de datos. • https://github.com/0zvxr/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/alt3kx/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/zangcc/CVE-2022-22965-rexbb https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22965-PoC https://github.com/tangxiaofeng7/CVE-2022-22965-Spring-Core-Rce https://github.com/p1ckzi/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22965 https://github.com/light-Life/CVE-2022-22965-GUItools https://github.com/viniciuspereiras/CVE-2022-22965-poc https://github.com/itsecurityco/CVE-2022-2 • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') •
CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 97%CPEs: 47EXPL: 23CVE-2022-22963 – VMware Tanzu Spring Cloud Function Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2022-22963
In Spring Cloud Function versions 3.1.6, 3.2.2 and older unsupported versions, when using routing functionality it is possible for a user to provide a specially crafted SpEL as a routing-expression that may result in remote code execution and access to local resources. En Spring Cloud Function versiones 3.1.6, 3.2.2 y versiones anteriores no soportadas, cuando es usada la funcionalidad routing es posible que un usuario proporcione un SpEL especialmente diseñado como expresión de enrutamiento que puede resultar en la ejecución de código remota y el acceso a recursos locales A flaw was found in Spring Cloud Function via the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header that is modified by the attacker to contain malicious expression language code. The attacker is able to call functions that should not normally be accessible, including runtime exec calls. Spring Cloud Function versions prior to 3.1.7 and 3.2.3 are vulnerable to remote code execution due to using an unsafe evaluation context with user-provided queries. By crafting a request to the application and setting the spring.cloud.function.routing-expression header, an unauthenticated attacker can gain remote code execution. • https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51577 https://github.com/dinosn/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/darryk10/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/RanDengShiFu/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/me2nuk/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/Kirill89/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https://github.com/charis3306/CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/HenriV-V/Exploit-for-CVE-2022-22963 https://github.com/iliass-dahman/CVE-2022-22963-POC https://github.com/lemmyz4n3771/CVE-2022-22963-PoC https • CWE-94: Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') CWE-917: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 1%CPEs: 17EXPL: 2CVE-2021-43859 – Denial of Service by injecting highly recursive collections or maps in XStream
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-43859
XStream is an open source java library to serialize objects to XML and back again. Versions prior to 1.4.19 may allow a remote attacker to allocate 100% CPU time on the target system depending on CPU type or parallel execution of such a payload resulting in a denial of service only by manipulating the processed input stream. XStream 1.4.19 monitors and accumulates the time it takes to add elements to collections and throws an exception if a set threshold is exceeded. Users are advised to upgrade as soon as possible. Users unable to upgrade may set the NO_REFERENCE mode to prevent recursion. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/02/09/1 https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/commit/e8e88621ba1c85ac3b8620337dd672e0c0c3a846 https://github.com/x-stream/xstream/security/advisories/GHSA-rmr5-cpv2-vgjf https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/02/msg00018.html https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VACQYG356OHUTD5WQGAQ4L2TTFTAV3SJ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XODFRE2ZL64FICBJDOPWOLPTSSAI4U7X& • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling •
CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 1CVE-2021-22569 – Denial of Service of protobuf-java parsing procedure
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-22569
An issue in protobuf-java allowed the interleaving of com.google.protobuf.UnknownFieldSet fields in such a way that would be processed out of order. A small malicious payload can occupy the parser for several minutes by creating large numbers of short-lived objects that cause frequent, repeated pauses. We recommend upgrading libraries beyond the vulnerable versions. Un problema en protobuf-java permitía intercalar campos com.google.protobuf.UnknownFieldSet de tal manera que eran procesados fuera de orden. Una pequeña carga útil maliciosa puede ocupar el analizador durante varios minutos al crear un gran número de objetos de corta duración que causan frecuentes y repetidas pausas. • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/12/4 http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/12/7 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=39330 https://cloud.google.com/support/bulletins#gcp-2022-001 https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/04/msg00019.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-22569 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039903 • CWE-696: Incorrect Behavior Order •
CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 213EXPL: 7CVE-2021-45105 – Apache Log4j2 does not always protect from infinite recursion in lookup evaluation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-45105
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. Apache Log4j2 versiones 2.0-alpha1 hasta 2.16.0 (excluyendo las versiones 2.12.3 y 2.3.1) no protegían de la recursión no controlada de las búsquedas autorreferenciales. Esto permite a un atacante con control sobre los datos de Thread Context Map causar una denegación de servicio cuando es interpretada una cadena diseñada. • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-1 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-dileepdkumar-https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-v htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •