37 results (0.051 seconds)

CVSS: 9.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 39EXPL: 0

18 Jan 2022 — CVE-2020-9493 identified a deserialization issue that was present in Apache Chainsaw. Prior to Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw was a component of Apache Log4j 1.2.x where the same issue exists. CVE-2020-9493 identificó un problema de deserialización presente en Apache Chainsaw. Versiones anteriores a Chainsaw V2.0 Chainsaw era un componente de Apache Log4j versiones 1.2.x donde se presenta el mismo problema A flaw was found in the log4j 1.x chainsaw component, where the contents of certain log entries are deserializ... • https://lists.apache.org/thread/rg4yyc89vs3dw6kpy3r92xop9loywyhh • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 15%CPEs: 42EXPL: 3

18 Jan 2022 — By design, the JDBCAppender in Log4j 1.2.x accepts an SQL statement as a configuration parameter where the values to be inserted are converters from PatternLayout. The message converter, %m, is likely to always be included. This allows attackers to manipulate the SQL by entering crafted strings into input fields or headers of an application that are logged allowing unintended SQL queries to be executed. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use the JDBCAppender, which is not... • https://github.com/HynekPetrak/log4shell-finder • CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') •

CVSS: 8.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 40EXPL: 0

18 Jan 2022 — JMSSink in all versions of Log4j 1.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration or if the configuration references an LDAP service the attacker has access to. The attacker can provide a TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configuration causing JMSSink to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-4104. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.x when specifically configured to use JMSSink, which i... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/01/18/3 • CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 8.5EPSS: 46%CPEs: 71EXPL: 3

28 Dec 2021 — Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-beta7 through 2.17.0 (excluding security fix releases 2.3.2 and 2.12.4) are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JDBC Appender with a JNDI LDAP data source URI when an attacker has control of the target LDAP server. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI data source names to the java protocol in Log4j2 versions 2.17.1, 2.12.4, and 2.3.2. Las versiones de Apache Log4j2 de la 2.0-beta7 a la 2.17.0 (excluyendo las versiones de corrección de seg... • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-74: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') •

CVSS: 7.5EPSS: 76%CPEs: 72EXPL: 1

14 Dec 2021 — JMSAppender in Log4j 1.2 is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data when the attacker has write access to the Log4j configuration. The attacker can provide TopicBindingName and TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName configurations causing JMSAppender to perform JNDI requests that result in remote code execution in a similar fashion to CVE-2021-44228. Note this issue only affects Log4j 1.2 when specifically configured to use JMSAppender, which is not the default. Apache Log4j 1.2 reached end of life in Au... • https://github.com/cckuailong/log4shell_1.x • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-502: Deserialization of Untrusted Data •

CVSS: 5.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 136EXPL: 1

13 Apr 2021 — In Apache Commons IO before 2.7, When invoking the method FileNameUtils.normalize with an improper input string, like "//../foo", or "\\..\foo", the result would be the same value, thus possibly providing access to files in the parent directory, but not further above (thus "limited" path traversal), if the calling code would use the result to construct a path value. En Apache Commons IO versiones anteriores a 2.7, Cuando se invoca el método FileNameUtils.normalize con una cadena de entrada inapropiada, como... • https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-556 • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') •

CVSS: 7.1EPSS: 0%CPEs: 12EXPL: 0

05 Mar 2021 — ssh-agent in OpenSSH before 8.5 has a double free that may be relevant in a few less-common scenarios, such as unconstrained agent-socket access on a legacy operating system, or the forwarding of an agent to an attacker-controlled host. ssh-agent en OpenSSH versiones anteriores a 8.5, presenta una doble liberación que puede ser relevante en algunos escenarios menos comunes, como el acceso sin restricciones al socket del agente en un sistema operativo heredado o el reenvío de un agente a un host controlado p... • https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/e04fd6dde16de1cdc5a4d9946397ff60d96568db • CWE-415: Double Free •

CVSS: 8.2EPSS: 0%CPEs: 37EXPL: 0

24 Feb 2021 — Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests. Apache Batik versión 1.13 es vulnerable a un ataque de tipo server-side request forgery, causada por una comprobación de entrada inapropiada por parte de NodePickerPanel. Al usar un argumento especialmente diseñado, un atacante podría e... • https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2877ae10e8be56a3c52d03e373512ddd32f16b863f24c2e22f5a5ba2%40%3Cdev.poi.apache.org%3E • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) •

CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 0%CPEs: 19EXPL: 1

15 Feb 2021 — The package python/cpython from 0 and before 3.6.13, from 3.7.0 and before 3.7.10, from 3.8.0 and before 3.8.8, from 3.9.0 and before 3.9.2 are vulnerable to Web Cache Poisoning via urllib.parse.parse_qsl and urllib.parse.parse_qs by using a vector called parameter cloaking. When the attacker can separate query parameters using a semicolon (;), they can cause a difference in the interpretation of the request between the proxy (running with default configuration) and the server. This can result in malicious ... • http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/02/19/4 • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •

CVSS: 9.8EPSS: 0%CPEs: 15EXPL: 1

19 Jan 2021 — Python 3.x through 3.9.1 has a buffer overflow in PyCArg_repr in _ctypes/callproc.c, which may lead to remote code execution in certain Python applications that accept floating-point numbers as untrusted input, as demonstrated by a 1e300 argument to c_double.from_param. This occurs because sprintf is used unsafely. Python versiones 3.x hasta 3.9.1, presenta un desbordamiento de búfer en la función PyCArg_repr en el archivo _ctypes/callproc.c, que puede conllevar a una ejecución de código remota en determina... • https://bugs.python.org/issue42938 • CWE-120: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') •