CVSS: 5.9EPSS: 96%CPEs: 213EXPL: 7CVE-2021-45105 – Apache Log4j2 does not always protect from infinite recursion in lookup evaluation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-45105
Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. Apache Log4j2 versiones 2.0-alpha1 hasta 2.16.0 (excluyendo las versiones 2.12.3 y 2.3.1) no protegían de la recursión no controlada de las búsquedas autorreferenciales. Esto permite a un atacante con control sobre los datos de Thread Context Map causar una denegación de servicio cuando es interpretada una cadena diseñada. • https://github.com/thedevappsecguy/Log4J-Mitigation-CVE-2021-44228--CVE-2021-45046--CVE-2021-45105--CVE-2021-44832 https://github.com/tejas-nagchandi/CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/pravin-pp/log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-1 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105 https://github.com/dileepdkumar/https-github.com-dileepdkumar-https-github.com-pravin-pp-log4j2-CVE-2021-45105-v htt • CWE-20: Improper Input Validation CWE-674: Uncontrolled Recursion •
CVSS: 8.3EPSS: 1%CPEs: 248EXPL: 4CVE-2021-2351 – Oracle Database Weak NNE Integrity Key Derivation
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-2351
Vulnerability in the Advanced Networking Option component of Oracle Database Server. Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.0.2, 12.2.0.1 and 19c. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Advanced Networking Option. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Advanced Networking Option, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Advanced Networking Option. • http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165255/Oracle-Database-Protection-Mechanism-Bypass.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/165258/Oracle-Database-Weak-NNE-Integrity-Key-Derivation.html http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Dec/19 http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2021/Dec/20 https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2022.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2023.html https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2021.html https:&# • CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm CWE-384: Session Fixation •
CVSS: 5.3EPSS: 10%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0CVE-2021-33037 – Incorrect Transfer-Encoding handling with HTTP/1.0
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2021-33037
Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding. Apache Tomcat versiones 10.0.0-M1 hasta 10.0.6, versiones 9.0.0.M1 hasta 9.0.46 y versiones 8.5.0 hasta 8.5.66, no analizaban correctamente el encabezado de petición HTTP transfer-encoding en algunas circunstancias, conllevando a la posibilidad de contrabando de peticiones cuando se usaba con un proxy inverso. Específicamente: - Tomcat ignoraba incorrectamente el encabezado de codificación de transferencia si el cliente declaraba que sólo aceptaría una respuesta HTTP/1.0; - Tomcat honraba la codificación de identificación; y - Tomcat no se aseguraba de que, si estaba presente, la codificación en trozos fuera la codificación final • https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10366 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r290aee55b72811fd19e75ac80f6143716c079170c5671b96932ed44b%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r40f921575aee8d7d34e53182f862c45cbb8f3d898c9d4e865c2ec262%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r612a79269b0d5e5780c62dfd34286a8037232fec0bc6f1a7e60c9381%40%3Cannounce.tomcat.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc6ef52453bb996a98cb45442871a1db56b7c349939e45d829bf9ae37%40%3Ccommits.tomee.apache.org%3E https:/ • CWE-444: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') •
CVSS: 6.5EPSS: 0%CPEs: 429EXPL: 0CVE-2019-10219 – hibernate-validator: safeHTML validator allows XSS
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-10219
A vulnerability was found in Hibernate-Validator. The SafeHtml validator annotation fails to properly sanitize payloads consisting of potentially malicious code in HTML comments and instructions. This vulnerability can result in an XSS attack. Una vulnerabilidad fue encontrada en Hibernate-Validator. La anotación del validador SafeHtml no puede sanear apropiadamente las cargas útiles que consisten en código potencialmente malicioso en los comentarios e instrucciones HTML. • https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0159 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0160 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0161 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0164 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0445 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2019-10219 https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f8b4e2541be4234946e40d55859273a7eec0f4901e8080ce2406fe6%40%3Cnotifications.accumulo.apache.org%3E https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r4f92d7f7682dcff92722fa947f9e6f8ba2227c5dc3e11ba0911 • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') •
CVSS: 6.1EPSS: 2%CPEs: 218EXPL: 4CVE-2019-11358 – jquery: Prototype pollution in object's prototype leading to denial of service, remote code execution, or property injection
https://notcve.org/view.php?id=CVE-2019-11358
jQuery before 3.4.0, as used in Drupal, Backdrop CMS, and other products, mishandles jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) because of Object.prototype pollution. If an unsanitized source object contained an enumerable __proto__ property, it could extend the native Object.prototype. jQuery, en versiones anteriores a 3.4.0, como es usado en Drupal, Backdrop CMS, y otros productos, maneja mal jQuery.extend(true, {}, ...) debido a la contaminación de Object.prototype. Si un objeto fuente no sanitizado contenía una propiedad enumerable __proto__, podría extender el Object.prototype nativo. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability was found in jquery. Untrusted JSON passed to the `extend` function could lead to modifying objects up the prototype chain, including the global Object. • https://github.com/isacaya/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/ossf-cve-benchmark/CVE-2019-11358 https://github.com/Snorlyd/https-nj.gov---CVE-2019-11358 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00006.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-08/msg00025.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/152787/dotCMS-5.1.1-Vulnerable-Dependencies.html http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153237/RetireJS-CORS-Issue-Script-Execution.html http://packetstormsecurity.c • CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') CWE-1321: Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes ('Prototype Pollution') •