21 results (0.101 seconds)

CVSS: 7.6EPSS: 2%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and Embedded 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Security. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80 y 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; y Java SE Embedded 7u75 y Embedded 8u33, permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad, integridad y disponibilidad a través de vectores desconocidos relacionados con Security. A flaw was found in the way the Libraries component of OpenJDK verified Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) responses. An OCSP response with no nextUpdate date specified was incorrectly handled as having unlimited validity, possibly causing a revoked X.509 certificate to be interpreted as valid. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00047.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1228.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1229.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/R • CWE-299: Improper Check for Certificate Revocation •

CVSS: 5.0EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45, JRockit R28.3.6, and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to JCE. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE en las versiones 6u95, 7u80 y 8u45, en JRockit R28.3.6 y en Java SE Embedded en las versiones 7u75y 8u33, permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad a través de vectores relacionados con la JCE. It was discovered that the JCE component in OpenJDK failed to use constant time comparisons in multiple cases. An attacker could possibly use these flaws to disclose sensitive information by measuring the time used to perform operations using these non-constant time comparisons. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00047.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1228.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1229.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/R • CWE-385: Covert Timing Channel •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 3%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect availability via vectors related to JNDI. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80 y 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; y Java SE Embedded 7u75 y 8u33, permite a atacantes remotos afectar la disponibilidad a través de vectores relacionados con JNDI. It was discovered that the JNDI component in OpenJDK did not handle DNS resolution errors correctly. An attacker able to trigger such DNS errors could cause a Java application using JNDI to consume memory and CPU time, and possibly block further DNS resolution. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00047.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1228.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1229.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/R • CWE-772: Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime •

CVSS: 2.6EPSS: 0%CPEs: 11EXPL: 0

Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, and 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; and Java SE Embedded 7u75 and 8u33 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to JSSE. Vulnerabilidad no especificada en Oracle Java SE 6u95, 7u80, y 8u45; JRockit R28.3.6; y Java SE Embedded 7u75 y 8u33, permite a atacantes remotos afectar la confidencialidad a través de vectores relacionados con JSSE. A flaw was found in the way the JSSE component in OpenJDK performed X.509 certificate identity verification when establishing a TLS/SSL connection to a host identified by an IP address. In certain cases, the certificate was accepted as valid if it was issued for a host name to which the IP address resolves rather than for the IP address. • http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10727 http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00039.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00040.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00046.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00047.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00000.html http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-12/msg00004.h • CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation •

CVSS: 4.3EPSS: 97%CPEs: 42EXPL: 0

The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier, when a DHE_EXPORT ciphersuite is enabled on a server but not on a client, does not properly convey a DHE_EXPORT choice, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct cipher-downgrade attacks by rewriting a ClientHello with DHE replaced by DHE_EXPORT and then rewriting a ServerHello with DHE_EXPORT replaced by DHE, aka the "Logjam" issue. El protocolo TLS 1.2 y anteriores, cuando una suite de cifrado DHE_EXPORT está habilitada en un servidor pero no en un cliente, no transporta una elección DHE_EXPORT, lo que permite a atacantes man-in-the-middle realizar ataques de degradación del cifrado mediante la rescritura de un ClientHello con DHE remplazado por DHE_EXPORT y posteriormente la rescritura de un ServerHello con DHE_EXPORT remplazado por DHE, también conocido como el problema 'Logjam'. A flaw was found in the way the TLS protocol composes the Diffie-Hellman exchange (for both export and non-export grade cipher suites). An attacker could use this flaw to downgrade a DHE connection to use export-grade key sizes, which could then be broken by sufficient pre-computation. This can lead to a passive man-in-the-middle attack in which the attacker is able to decrypt all traffic. • http://aix.software.ibm.com/aix/efixes/security/sendmail_advisory2.asc http://fortiguard.com/advisory/2015-07-09-cve-2015-1793-openssl-alternative-chains-certificate-forgery http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2015-008.txt.asc http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04876402 http://h20564.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-c04949778 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10681 http://kb.juniper.net/InfoC • CWE-310: Cryptographic Issues CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm •